The positioning of the micro driver in Telos Fujisan design is what I think the important design factor to achieve good sound quality. By keeping the distance between the driver to the ear drum as short as possible, it avoids unnecessary reflection and increase detail and clarity.
Yes, I'm interested to review Telos Fujisan. Why, I do review and a big fan of dynamic micro driver earphones.
Thanks for the opportunity!
Here are some of my reviews that might be relevant:
Review of Audio-Technica ATH-IM01, ATH-IM02, ATH-IM03, ATH-IM04, ATH-IM50, & ATH-IM70:
http://www.head-fi.org/t/705687/review-of-audio-technica-ath-im01-ath-im02-ath-im03-ath-im04-ath-im50-ath-im70
Review of Audio-Technica ATH-CKR9 & ATH-CKR10:
http://www.head-fi.org/t/720461/review-of-audio-technica-ath-ckr9-ath-ckr10
Review of Brainwavz S5:
http://www.head-fi.org/products/brainwavz-s5-in-ear-headphones/reviews/11370
Review of Brainwavz S0:
http://www.head-fi.org/products/brainwavz-s0-in-ear-headphones/reviews/11899
Review of Brainwavz R3:
http://www.head-fi.org/products/brainwavz-r3-revised-edition/reviews/11781
Review of DUNU DN-2000 Hybrid 3 ways IEM:
http://www.head-fi.org/products/dunu-dn-2000-hybrid-3-way-earphone/reviews/11418
Review of DUNU DN-1000 Hybrid 3 ways IEM:
http://www.head-fi.org/products/dunu-dn-1000/reviews/11417