iFi audio iDSD Diablo - A portable reference done our way!

Feb 15, 2021 at 7:23 PM Post #586 of 3,063
Just got mine - very initial impressions - it’s warm and detailed and bass all at the same time. Don’t need 3D button and XBass would have been too much. It’s perfect. No channel imbalance either. I’ve not got that far because Roon is freaking out and not recognising the device after a couple of config tweaks. I’ll switch back to JRiver, Tidal and Qobuz for the time being and report further. Oh also HD660S, the vol is about 12-1 o’clock on Normal (edit - Sorry thought it was on Eco!). Perfecto. Definitely lower vol setting than the BL had me at.
 
Last edited:
Feb 15, 2021 at 11:36 PM Post #587 of 3,063
I switched over to balanced and it's a touch louder as expected. Turning it down to same level, there is even more dynamicism. It's actually a fairly different sound - although balanced are my stock HD660S cables, unbalanced I'm using Periapt. So I'm off to the Periapt website after this post to even the score...

The sound quality though is.... insane... to my ears. I don't know why I was on the fence, and note to those who are - JUST GET THIS!!!
It's like a full, pleasant, natural sound, with exactly the right amount of bass at all times, however they did that, and yet there is incredibly well resolved positioning and like a layering to the sound... This is something that was never truly audible with the BL. The Diablo is NOT a Micro device, it just happens to be similar size. I am a n00b as I say, but I have NEVER heard my music sound this beautiful. I'm not going to sleep much tonight I suspect for sound tests.....

So in summary I'd describe this as a really enjoyable, highly detailed, position resolving work of audio art. You need one. Everyone needs one. I can take it to work, I can keep it at home, I can wander around with the thing, thanks to the splendid bag that is the exact right size. Yet it's the best thing I've ever heard.

Well done iFi, and thank you - for me this is DAC/amp endgame and that is exactly what I was after. Zeos P ought to be busting open his best for this one. :beerchug:
 
Feb 16, 2021 at 12:18 AM Post #588 of 3,063
Despite claiming that both toslink and coax SPDIF inputs are supported, iFi does not include both adapters, only optical.

So I have been using my iPurifier to convert from coax to toslink in order to feed Diablo with SPDIF -only to discover that, unlike with USB, this DAC will not render MQA through the digital input despite Roon sending appropriate instructions.

You do get good sound through this workaround, but not the promised functionality.

Diablo's USB input works just fine for MQA decoding, as does my iDSD Nano Black Label (USB input only) for MQA rendering -once they updated the firmware.

Just in case the iPurifier is somehow interrupting MQA signaling, my dealer recommended that, for 3.5mm coax input, we can buy a $24 SPDIF cable described as "compatible with FiiO X3, X5" from Amazon. Because I need to have about a 12 ft. distance from my Allo DigiOne Signature Roon endpoint, I ordered this 75 ohm cable instead in order to connect with an existing 10 ft. SPDIF cable.

Sure hope this additional purchase works, and solves the MQA failure...
...but that would mean the iPurifier's claimed functionality is compromised.

Of course it could be that Diablo's firmware isn't ready, like it wasn't when I first used my then new Nano BL (shipped with v5.2 "Limoncello"). It was version 5.3 that later enabled MQA.

I wish they would get their act together.
Yes, seems odd/very impacting for usability..
Given the thing says MQA CD compatible, and whilst I haven’t read anything about it (I am firmly anti MQA market adoption), I would expect, like HDCD, that a digital stream would just pass the right ‘encoded’ information.. (its up to the decoder to deal with).
I’d lean towards a firmware update being a viable solution (and also believe that the iFi dongle range simple clean up but effectively ‘don’t alter’)
Cheers for reporting some teething problems

I had a tonne of ‘em (connectivity issues) last night when I realised that in no practical way can I use the USB input with most of my present audio devices, and was truly caught out for the lack of COAX digital dongle :triply so due to selling my FIIO X5 (and dongle) just last week, and went to length to explain to the new owner about taking care not to lose it (the COAX dongle) which sadly they didn’t even see a need for. (I kinda keep scratching my head with regards to replacing the Chord Hugo, as it just doesn’t compare well from an audio point of view (the whole reason we bother to buy these things), but it is so practical due to connections.. (even if I only have one plugged in at a time, and not as a (DAC) preamp and source selector for the den audio rig, like it can be...)
Almost wish I’d kept the FIIO now (for the cable); and not being able to plug in a Sony NWZ-ZX1 even though I have four plugs for it, was frustrating (especially given the iFi webpage uses photos of this exact DAP when selling how to upgrade DAP sound.. with outboard DAC/amp).
The lack of COAX has caught me out twice now. (and it is my preferred interface, as from decades of testing a 1/3rd the cost COAX cable typically equals fibre optic, and fibre optic has two more ’checkpoints’ that I’d rather not go through in order to pass digital (in an ideal case scenario).
The iPurifier being without adapter cables (like the retail units have) and the lack of COAX plug, or short cable (3.5mm to female phone plug) is the biggest omission thus far, that I can see, even vs ‘not running from the Playstation5 (which are without fibre optic output) (and ARC, or using TOSLINK from the TV both add considerable lag an are therefore useless for gaming).

Still think this is the best DAC I’ve had the joy of playing with. (It just trumps all parts I’ve heard up to ‘silly money’) even vs an uber dollar marantz 4x high end DAC chip and high quality headphone amp design, albeit from yesteryear, it murders cleanly. The only thing I can do now to create a fight is to try the iPurifier into the Chord Hugo and use high end reference RCAs into a fairly expensive desktop amp.. At which point I would expect music genres to split the results.. (if it does ideally level the playing field) The size and cost differences being ‘ridiculous’ with the Diablo being the no brainer cheaper part with better audio.
 
Feb 16, 2021 at 12:44 AM Post #589 of 3,063
(...)natural sound, with exactly the right amount of bass at all times, however they did that, and yet there is incredibly well resolved positioning and like a layering to the sound...

Your short post nails so much of what I get too tempted to ‘wax lyrical’ about.
“Succinct.”

Its that bass trick that is the jaw dropper - no matter what is going on with the music, no matter what the dynamic range playing out, “all instruments’ having full weight to their notes, WITH that crazy bass note deliver (in its own air space) and BELONGING to the instrument from which it comes; is what makes this product feel like DAC evolution.

I gather iFi license clever circuit designs, but their recent acquisitions, to my understanding, at a ‘high end engineering’ level really is paying off.

Around a year ago a person was asking me whether to buy iFi. A little reseach and the names I was reading being associated with their designs, and I prostrated the ground and payed hommage.
My best DAC ever was a crazy thing made by Parasound, and listening tests in high end audio shops put its’ ’several thousand dollar‘ part (not top of the line) happily holding its own vs stuff ten times the price. (“not much in it”) and it murdered the Musical Fidelity stuff at a few times higher price points (my then ‘happy go to’).

Good engineers know what they are doing,.. and the Diablo design seems to have thrown overboard all the stuff that was holding it back. This unit is better than its pricepoint declares.
Hope they don’t do what Questyle did after retuning.. (double the price for the ‘next gen/same stuff’, which was still half as costly as the products it honestly competed with)
Thats why I believe this product is (too) cheap. (and/or should sell out for awhile as people figure it out) - Just when DACs have been getting ‘yawn‘ or not following the ‘seven years/one tier’ rule of thumb, this single product comes along and churns up the market.
A lot of people will be assuming that this is just a cost cutting part (removed features) and charging ‘more for less’ (what we should expect in a world post covid, where many businesses will have to passalong expense to stay afloat, with stuff like FTC propositions to lower production costs by manufacturers and allow spec sheet manipulation by the ‘cheap stuff’.
The Diablo is the best thing to happen right now. It is the silver lining.
And yeah- this is what happens when Rolls Royce level engineering is given away in a showbag. (no one knows just how good a thing they’ve been given)

The problem in some review markets when this happens, and I use the Definitive Technology Symphony 1’s as an example,.. that ‘based on price point’ people compare and around this price point (beer budget) most people don’t know how to benchmark and understand ‘truly high end‘ sound quality.
Things being revealed for being poor quality (ie a recording that sounds good on a ‘gloss over’ DAC) might sound worse on this, and so a mixed review bag will sully the parts reputation.
This (Diablo) is gold for candy coin.
 
Last edited:
Feb 16, 2021 at 1:12 AM Post #590 of 3,063
The included iPurifier 3 works with MQA for me.

Edit:
Nvm I’m too noob in SPDIF tech

Despite claiming that both toslink and coax SPDIF inputs are supported, iFi does not include both adapters, only optical.

So I have been using my iPurifier to convert from coax to toslink in order to feed Diablo with SPDIF -only to discover that, unlike with USB, this DAC will not render MQA through the digital input despite Roon sending appropriate instructions.

You do get good sound through this workaround, but not the promised functionality.

Diablo's USB input works just fine for MQA decoding, as does my iDSD Nano Black Label (USB input only) for MQA rendering -once they updated the firmware.

Just in case the iPurifier is somehow interrupting MQA signaling, my dealer recommended that, for 3.5mm coax input, we can buy a $24 SPDIF cable described as "compatible with FiiO X3, X5" from Amazon. Because I need to have about a 12 ft. distance from my Allo DigiOne Signature Roon endpoint, I ordered this 75 ohm cable instead in order to connect with an existing 10 ft. SPDIF cable.

Sure hope this additional purchase works, and solves the MQA failure...
...but that would mean the iPurifier's claimed functionality is compromised.

Of course it could be that Diablo's firmware isn't ready, like it wasn't when I first used my then new Nano BL (shipped with v5.2 "Limoncello"). It was version 5.3 that later enabled MQA.

I wish they would get their act together.
 
Last edited:
Feb 16, 2021 at 11:42 AM Post #591 of 3,063
I switched over to balanced and it's a touch louder as expected. Turning it down to same level, there is even more dynamicism. It's actually a fairly different sound - although balanced are my stock HD660S cables, unbalanced I'm using Periapt. So I'm off to the Periapt website after this post to even the score...

The sound quality though is.... insane... to my ears. I don't know why I was on the fence, and note to those who are - JUST GET THIS!!!
It's like a full, pleasant, natural sound, with exactly the right amount of bass at all times, however they did that, and yet there is incredibly well resolved positioning and like a layering to the sound... This is something that was never truly audible with the BL. The Diablo is NOT a Micro device, it just happens to be similar size. I am a n00b as I say, but I have NEVER heard my music sound this beautiful. I'm not going to sleep much tonight I suspect for sound tests.....

So in summary I'd describe this as a really enjoyable, highly detailed, position resolving work of audio art. You need one. Everyone needs one. I can take it to work, I can keep it at home, I can wander around with the thing, thanks to the splendid bag that is the exact right size. Yet it's the best thing I've ever heard.

Well done iFi, and thank you - for me this is DAC/amp endgame and that is exactly what I was after. Zeos P ought to be busting open his best for this one. :beerchug:

Thank you, mate! Glad to hear you've been enjoying every second with it so far.
 
Feb 16, 2021 at 8:25 PM Post #592 of 3,063
Break In:
after 100 hours (+) the sound has changed enough to comment..

Now it always amazes me how many of the ‘science’ guys discount equipment sound changing with some run in. (or even cables being practical to tailor a sound/making a difference)
I suppose it is one of those things that a person has to experience for themself before understanding it is ‘a thing’. (and yes I am familiar with the arguments, ad nauseum, that the changes are ‘me’ adjusting to the sound etc.)

So please skip this post if the notion of its contents offends your beliefs, or that you think a person foolish for believing it to be so..

Of course there is a reason many reviewers WILL NOT review equipment ‘fresh from a box’, and whilst it is generally more noticeable with equipment with moving parts (eg speaker driver surrounds), that ‘front end electronics’ do change, not just with warm up, but also with initial use/run in.. means that many will ’go easy’ on a product fresh from the box until it has had a chance to settle somewhat.

Having kept the Diablo firing on all cylinders; alternating between output from the rear and front of the amp, and feeding it near exclusively 16bit 44khz via fibre optic, I have noticed a significant change in terms of sound output.

This morning, doing my typical ‘6am check’ (more than half my ‘break in’ happens at night whilst I am sleeping), I started with some Lamb to get me awake instantly to its sound (I was already ’awake’ having hung washing out in the cool morning air);
This was with the Diablo in ‘Eco’ power output with the dial up to 2o’clock - which is as loud as I can handle driving some ‘fairly sensitive’ over ears, some Utrasone Edition 5, which due to their design which fires the sound onto the whole ear (not aimed direct at the ear canal), are known for allowing sound around 3dB louder and sounding ‘equal’.. (this isn’t marketing, either as I know it to be true, to the point of buying some Ultrasones for my child to listen to now they are a teenager and have moved to punk, alternate and industrial catalogues as part of their music range)
In short- ”loud was the listening preference’;

Lamb - Lamb Remixed - Wonder (Dead Guys Vocal Mix), there is a part in this track where a radio DJ cuts in and different headphones can reveal the cut to the the sound from the simulated DJ equipment either as a drop on volume (lesser headphones/amp not getting the compression right) through to ‘overly revealing’ (if clinical) where a noise with the DJs feed comes through.. There is a beaut middle ground, that the Diablo resolves, and that is what I believe the track should give. Listening today, the track sounded perfect. VS my first day experience, it was a touch too clinical. This was good, as I have been checking constantly to see if the Diablos trick is like resolving like a Sabre DAC chip, which to me, is typical implementations that are ‘very digital’; and to those who like their digital sounding, erm, clean and bright/sharp, then this can be a good thing. As a person who used to seek out Ken Ishiwatas’ special edition marantz CD players (some with bamboo boards and offset angles in their engineering etc) I fall into the camp of wanting my digital to sound analogue. (these are, after all, Digital to Analogue Converters)..
Hearing Lamb this morning sound ‘better’ than it did ‘straight out the gate’ (new from the box), it had me quickly check with a few more tracks,.. so over to-

Lamb - Fear of Fours -(1) Soft Mistake,(3) B Line,(6) Bonfire,(7) Ear Parcel,(8) Softly,(9) Here; by the time I got to Softly I was tearing up knowing what I was about to experience.. before Louises’ vocal could fully form the opening lyric I knew, based on the albums‘ tracks playing out superbly up to this point, what I could expect.
Lamb is drum and bass if my local music stores labelling is to be believed. This album, which I had intended to play only a ‘track or two’ like everything through the Diablo DAC, draws me in and keeps me listening. It is all just better. Some of that interest belongs to how it soundstages and images. Some is the joyus delivery of what it outputs, but most of it goes to being enthralled by an analogue sound that is just ‘better’. Its when dynamics are being driven with wide range and low notes and low level information is played back ’not artificial‘ but softly and fully resolved (not with decayed edges) at the same time as playing clean metallic sounds at large volume, (and everything in between) all in a non fatiguing way.. It just keeps a keen audiofool riveted to their seat.

OK so I was in bed lying down,.. but, well, “I WAS RIVITED”!.
A few days ago I had the inverse effect, on some IEMs, known to have a softer top end, and knowing that the DAC might filter hard beyond 17khz, there was a strange effect. I was literally nauseous from ‘too much sound stage and, the bass felt overdriven.. It was uncomfortable as I felt claustrophobic/and disconnected from the physical plane, and wanting to pull the buds from my ears, yet at the same time the sheer scale and sound stage, especially front to back, and ‘beyond normal limits of left to right’ that I had become accustomed to hearing, was ‘too much for my senses’. I endured (poor me), but noticed when I pulled the buds out that a real ’pop’ sound happened. I had, in my enthusiasm for my first listen with them, shoved them further into my ears than anytime previous. A dual flange tip, I had never had ‘that level’ of seal. It explained why I couldn’t handle the bass.. It wasn’t a loud level but the Diablos’ ability to resolve so cleanly and naturally, made the whole experience very disconcerting.

Gtting back to Lamb being (or not being) drum n bass, by the time ‘Ear Parcel’ played, I had realised that something had certainly changed in the Diablo over the last week.. soundstaging has moved firmly forward. This has come at what might say is a recession in the leading edge of each note, it now sounds like a ‘dark amp’ if I am describing this correctly. The Diablo is no longer (potentially) bright, or, any nuance of digital edge is gone. Notes still decay properly Every note and sound effect still has air, and beautiful placement,.. but now a little sharpness that ‘wasn’t really there’ is gone. And the cohesion that this experience pulls together is resolved by the brain as ‘better imaging’. It might translate to less ‘left to right’ scope, but really it totals as a better presentation. At no point do I feel the music is in my head now.
Playing onto tracks (12)Five, and, (13)Lullaby - I did mention that the listening experience is addictive- this is the best translation of this album I have heard. It has bested the best I have heard previously (and that was through a setup worth more than many peoples homes (just the structure, not including furniture, but, maybe also the land).. now I gather that headphones setups cost ’a lot less’ than speaker/hifi rigs to hit the same level of quality.. Without doubt the Diablo is impressing me for its relative ‘toy’ cost (and look) in a tier of diminishing returns that is big dollar high fidelity audio.

Having spanned a few Lamb albums, I truly wondered if I had lost all high frequency sharpness.. it was too placed to far away and seemed ‘less bright’. I was starting to think of this part as ‘dark’ when my belief up to this point is ‘exceptionally neutral’ and flatline, just ‘getting out of the way’ and letting the audio happen, as was recorded, but delivering the best renditions of notes with nuance and texture surrounded by air and being organic; so onto-

Daft Punk - Discovery -(2) Aerodynamic.. nope, brilliant, I was wrong to believe that high frequency was chilled.. This track does some interesting things with the frequencies, and when the bass kicks in, with such control and measure, whilst delivering such crisp and clean response with high frequencies that could cut a bread loaf.. if it is recorded, it will playback intact. This naturally led to the best version of track (4) ‘Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger’ that I have ever heard.

So knowing that the Diablo was getting better, and now had its musical chops being more realised, time to give it something to wow me:

Delirium - Karma - (4) Silence; this is a track that I have spent most of my listens to at 48khz, due to it being on a great compilation music DVD, to say I know this track well is an understatement, and the extra ~10% more samples (at 48khz) means that CDs can sound weak or ‘thin’ by comparison. This was the most organic take on this track. The low level echos and instruments at the threshold of low hearing (this with the volume pot at the 2o’clock spot) blew me away. I am now keen to nab some balanced cables to claim the extra ‘up to 6dB’ of dynamic range that can be had. (thanks @ianjturner for reminding me).. oh and Sarah McLachlans‘ spirited singing is divine (her studio albums are fantasitc)

So back to opening tracks on Enigma - MCMXC (one of my test tracks for soundstage), yep definitely a soundstage that has moved forward, with the net effect being a less perceived left to right pan, but vastly improved due to being placed in air in a ‘very real soundfield’ built up before me.

The Diablo has incredible control and very nuanced organic and musical delivery. I stand by my early comments of ‘it gets out of the way’; this is a DAC that appears to not artificially colour music in an effort to make it sound good.. its the opposite- it will reveal a perfectly analogue rendition (with the range of nuances typically only found with big dollar equipment) and if you feed it garbage in, you are going to have that garbage revealed in all its (lack of) splendour.

That being said- many of my seventies recordings have never sounded livelier or ‘more analogue’, and when they have been ‘at parity’ they have had the clicks and pops that one quickly detunes from their perception (Vinyl)
Having Vinyl like sound with stereo bass notes (below 100hz) and not having to get up every half hour (lazy)/or with ability to randomise a collection of music, is digitals strength. The Diablo delivers on the promise of digital audio as a ‘musical’ storage format. I’ve had a lot of DACs that get many aspects of digital/analogue right, but few that do everything the Diablo does, and NONE OF THEM for such little coin outlay.
I would choose this part, cost irrelevant, over most DACs I have ever heard.
(and I didn’t feel THAT way a week ago - a little break in does wonders)
 
Last edited:
Feb 16, 2021 at 11:25 PM Post #593 of 3,063
Many thanks for your feedback :)

I'll ask internally whether we have any plans for UAC1.
Something at a firmware level would be worthwhile: The Nintendo Switch and Playstation consoles will not work with USB output and the Diablo.

I don’t need MQA via fibre optic (not sure if board layout allows this, or what I would be giving up to try and force such a function)..
Happy with Non Oversampling (NOS) if that is where it has to be..

But please do add support. Game consoles take more time from me that listening to music, and it would allow me to use the tool

Some feedback regarding the LACK OF connect-ability (straight out of the box, sans COAX adapter and no micro USB in etc) -is a large knock against the product. I own a lot of cables and dongles and adapters. And DACs. With the exception of straight USB B ‘PC DACs’, I’ve never had a product hold me back from simply plugging in a phone or ‘other device’.
I gather some of my ‘budget’ DAC boxes, eg a Creative E5, which licenses Apple, and can plug straight into an iPad, have paid royalties to do some stuff.. but not being able to plug an android devices in (from my Sony NWZ ZX1 walkman to several Galaxy Notes/Xperia Z5 etc) could have been facilitated with a small adaptor, which I only need due to iFi choosing to use a Male type A USB on the unit. (even an adaptor to allow this to become Female would have removed qualms/issues for many)..
I gather that the Male plug on the unit is for ‘good reasons’, but combined with no micro port for input, means the box being without the COAX dongle (needed) and the included TOSLINK dongle pushing hard against the 4.4mm XLR outputs; it all feels ‘a little teething’.
I like the sound, but understand that a version 2 will be a hands down win.. which a couple of dimes spent on two more adaptors could have really raised the profile of the product, opened up ’many more’ usage scenarios (instantly) and, given the dollars lost on iPurifiers and iPowers, seems like a miss, really.
I like the lack of ports if it means better audio (I truly believe it does), and I wouldn’t want the noise or requisite switch that users might expect if it had ‘lots of inputs’.. but for lack of two adapters (USB type A male to female and 3.5mm COAX) the product is ‘less than perfect’ <sad face here>.
COAX is the better transport method generally wanted by many audiophiles that have been doing this for ‘a long time’. COAX requires less conversion for SPDIF, which to transmit as TOSLINK goes through two additional stages. For an ‘audio first’ device like this one, including a generic TOSLINK plug vs a much needed COAX one, is a misstep.. especially due to the TOSLINK part not fitting in the device if using as a DAC into home hifi.
I know I am repeating myself here.. but this is stuff that NEEDs to be addressed. A statement of acknowledgement, and ideally fixing batch two sales products with the appropriate parts, restores the perfect 10 you are delivering with this part.
For a few dimes; please do!

(edit: not that I am saying to drop TOSLINK adapter -TVs and most modern hifi seems to have gone this way)
 
Last edited:
Feb 17, 2021 at 8:11 AM Post #594 of 3,063
Battery Life:
from 6am to 20:43- just shy of fifteen hours from a full charge using ECO and with the volume dial higher than the 2o’clock position.. (toslink with 16bit@44khz)
Was too loud to listen to and so was on the table most of the day using my over ears driven so loud that the room was filled with music.
This was on the third recharge.. definately squeezing more life from the battery than the first charge. (it usually takes a couple to have the battery perform its best)
So iFi state 12 hours (eco), and I got just shy of 15 hours with the volume cranked higher than I could handle it..
My IEMs like the 10o’clock position, so that is a test for another day...


edit: the next day I got well more than 12 hours use, same scenario (16bit 44khz over TOSLINK) running at the 2o’clock position on the dial. -before the green light turned to red (13 hours and red is nowhere near flashing yet!!)...

Due to these types of batteries generally living longer when kept operating between 20-80%; I love the battery feedback and management (based on what I have read elsewhere) that iFi give.
This is fantastic, and once my light stops being green having a predictable amount of extra runtime, and having ten percent power left when the red lit signal begins to flash.. this is a neat and usable method to communicate with the user...
It looks to me like iFi are happy to under promise and over deliver.. an aspect I see in areas such as their support and continued refinement (very impressive firmware support)...
I must admit I am thoroughly impressed by their participation in an active way on these forums and the transparency I see them giving.
iFi - call me impressed!

edit 2: ran another day doing exact same test, this time at lowest usable point on volume pot, and got basically the same runtime...
this really excites me in terms of what it means the circuit is doing. (if I had gotten longer battery life for running at lower volume output it would tell me something ’ho hum’ regarding the amp circuits design). Given the unit runs relatively cool this is great. I am seeing some really clever design here.. (conversely; my ‘current mode’ headphone amp in the questyle qp1r gets hot and has me use it as a digital transport only to up product/battery longevity)
 
Last edited:
Feb 17, 2021 at 11:10 AM Post #595 of 3,063
@whitedragem It's almost as if you're writing a book on the Diablo!
Something at a firmware level would be worthwhile: The Nintendo Switch and Playstation consoles will not work with USB output and the Diablo.

I don’t need MQA via fibre optic (not sure if board layout allows this, or what I would be giving up to try and force such a function)..
Happy with Non Oversampling (NOS) if that is where it has to be..

But please do add support. Game consoles take more time from me that listening to music, and it would allow me to use the tool

For an ‘audio first’ device like this one, including a generic TOSLINK plug vs a much needed COAX one, is a misstep.. especially due to the TOSLINK part not fitting in the device if using as a DAC into home hifi.
I know I am repeating myself here.. but this is stuff that NEEDs to be addressed. A statement of acknowledgement, and ideally fixing batch two sales products with the appropriate parts, restores the perfect 10 you are delivering with this part.
For a few dimes; please do!

(edit: not that I am saying to drop TOSLINK adapter -TVs and most modern hifi seems to have gone this way)

@iFi audio and I will check on this for you and see if we have any updates!


Battery Life:
from 6am to 20:43- just shy of fifteen hours from a full charge using ECO and with the volume dial higher than the 2o’clock position..
Was too loud to listen to and so was on the table most of the day using my over ears driven so loud that the room was filled with music.
This was on the third recharge.. definately squeezing more life from the battery than the first charge. (it usually takes a couple to have the battery perform its best)
So iFi state 12 hours (eco), and I got just shy of 15 hours with the volume cranked higher than I could handle it..
My IEMs like the 10o’clock position, so that is a test for another day...

This is super interesting! I haven't tried my personal unit out the whole way, so happy to hear it lasts longer than expected on Eco!
 
Feb 17, 2021 at 5:09 PM Post #596 of 3,063
But please do add support.

If we can, rest assured that we will. We know how important it is to gamers so stay tuned :)

Sure hope this additional purchase works, and solves the MQA failure...
...but that would mean the iPurifier's claimed functionality is compromised.

Of course it could be that Diablo's firmware isn't ready, like it wasn't when I first used my then new Nano BL (shipped with v5.2 "Limoncello"). It was version 5.3 that later enabled MQA.

iDSD Diablo doesn't do MQA via SPDIF, but it might in the future :)

I wish they would get their act together.

Duly noted.
 
Last edited:
iFi audio Stay updated on iFi audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/people/IFi-audio/61558986775162/ https://twitter.com/ifiaudio https://www.instagram.com/ifiaudio/ https://ifi-audio.com/ https://www.youtube.com/@iFiaudiochannel comms@ifi-audio.com
Feb 17, 2021 at 5:15 PM Post #597 of 3,063
Has anyone tried with Abyss Diana v2? Wondering if power is more important than a dac, need a transportable desktop (battery powered) setup, thinking if this or Chord Hugo 2 (which some people called insufficient for Diana).
 
Feb 18, 2021 at 10:40 AM Post #598 of 3,063
I auditioned the iFi Signature vs the Diablo and based on the headphones I had that time, I felt that I liked the sound of the Signature better -- it felt a lot more like the iFi house sound but improved and refined, then I thought the Signature was a little too clinical for me. However, now that I have just bought a Meze Empyrean, I would like to try the Diablo again and see how well it pairs with it. Empyrean actually already sounds magical with the Signature and I am interested to find out with the Diablo because I think it could also nicely complement the Empyrean's slightly warmer and darker sound character. If anyone has experience with pairing the Diablo with some of these higher end planars, please do share your experience.

On a side note, for full sized cans like an Empyrean or HE1KSE, I feel that a DAP will never beat the sound quality of a good portable for the price. Maybe the 2k+ A&K Daps can try, but I would probably still prefer the sound of the cheaper Diablo or Signature. And then a 2k DAP's sound would hardly be able to compete with Chord Hugo 2 for the same price.

More for transportability (e.g. around the house, balcony, pool area, hotel room etc), my set up is:
1) iFi Signature (TBD for the Diablo)
2) My old Note 9 as dedicated DAP using UAPP. Set up the launcher and the widgets so it appears as a big screen DAP. This is attached to Signature with a nano tape (excellent hack I must say -- it's very secure! and can safely remove and reattach). Battery is huge and Android O/S is more up-to-date and better supported than O/S of DAPs. Can have SD card. seriously better screen. And kinda "free" because it's my old phone gathering dust in my drawer.
3) And if I want Bluetooth, I attach a tiny little Topping BC3 that serves as my modular Bluetooth 5.0 receiver (already has all your needed BT codecs), that can then bypass its own DAC and feed into the DAC/AMP of the Signature via optical connection.
4) Empyrean as my choice of super light and comfy headphones
 
Feb 18, 2021 at 11:15 AM Post #599 of 3,063
I auditioned the iFi Signature vs the Diablo and based on the headphones I had that time, I felt that I liked the sound of the Signature better -- it felt a lot more like the iFi house sound but improved and refined, then I thought the Signature was a little too clinical for me. However, now that I have just bought a Meze Empyrean, I would like to try the Diablo again and see how well it pairs with it. Empyrean actually already sounds magical with the Signature and I am interested to find out with the Diablo because I think it could also nicely complement the Empyrean's slightly warmer and darker sound character. If anyone has experience with pairing the Diablo with some of these higher end planars, please do share your experience.

On a side note, for full sized cans like an Empyrean or HE1KSE, I feel that a DAP will never beat the sound quality of a good portable for the price. Maybe the 2k+ A&K Daps can try, but I would probably still prefer the sound of the cheaper Diablo or Signature. And then a 2k DAP's sound would hardly be able to compete with Chord Hugo 2 for the same price.

More for transportability (e.g. around the house, balcony, pool area, hotel room etc), my set up is:
1) iFi Signature (TBD for the Diablo)
2) My old Note 9 as dedicated DAP using UAPP. Set up the launcher and the widgets so it appears as a big screen DAP. This is attached to Signature with a nano tape (excellent hack I must say -- it's very secure! and can safely remove and reattach). Battery is huge and Android O/S is more up-to-date and better supported than O/S of DAPs. Can have SD card. seriously better screen. And kinda "free" because it's my old phone gathering dust in my drawer.
3) And if I want Bluetooth, I attach a tiny little Topping BC3 that serves as my modular Bluetooth 5.0 receiver (already has all your needed BT codecs), that can then bypass its own DAC and feed into the DAC/AMP of the Signature via optical connection.
4) Empyrean as my choice of super light and comfy headphones

Please do post your feedback with the Empy, I hope they meld together well!

Has anyone tried with Abyss Diana v2? Wondering if power is more important than a dac, need a transportable desktop (battery powered) setup, thinking if this or Chord Hugo 2 (which some people called insufficient for Diana).

I'm sure someone here has! I haven't unfortunately since I don't own one in the house (not many brick and mortar dealers in Colorado either!)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top