If you tried on a perfectly transparent headphone, would you still complain about it? Is live music really "perfect"?
Jun 4, 2016 at 11:50 PM Post #2 of 17
I have a lot of experience performing live music (much more than merely listening) in orchestras, wind ensembles, marching bands, a jazz band, and so on...and I gotta tell ya...real instruments (especially cymbals, trumpets, piano, and the like) can be bright and even painful...though that's more so when you're right next to them; less so when you're out in the audience.
 
Still, many headphones are brighter than is accurate. Hearing a headphone that is both transparent and neutral will be less fatiguing compared to that. My current transparent + neutral reference is the STAX SR-207.
 
And of course, the recording techniques are crucial. I remember one concert I performed in that sounded amazing when I was there, but the recording of it sounded awful! Also remember that if everything is close-miked, it's not going to sound like it would if you were in the audience. It's difficult to replicate that experience in a recording.
 
Jun 5, 2016 at 12:33 AM Post #3 of 17
  I have a lot of experience performing live music (much more than merely listening) in orchestras, wind ensembles, marching bands, a jazz band, and so on...and I gotta tell ya...real instruments (especially cymbals, trumpets, piano, and the like) can be bright and even painful...though that's more so when you're right next to them; less so when you're out in the audience.
 
Still, many headphones are brighter than is accurate. Hearing a headphone that is both transparent and neutral will be less fatiguing compared to that. My current transparent + neutral reference is the STAX SR-207.
 
And of course, the recording techniques are crucial. I remember one concert I performed in that sounded amazing when I was there, but the recording of it sounded awful! Also remember that if everything is close-miked, it's not going to sound like it would if you were in the audience. It's difficult to replicate that experience in a recording.

Thanks for your contribution to music :)
I just had my first live classical experience this evening, Britten's War Requiem. I loved it, and I felt a milld euphoria for a while afterward. I was thinking about how it sounded compared to different headphones.It started off sounding bright and a bit dry 
rolleyes.gif
 and then once i got used to it, it reminded m e a bit of the time I demoed the LCD3, but with more detail and  
rolleyes.gif
 imaging. 
 
Jun 5, 2016 at 12:41 AM Post #4 of 17
  Thanks for your contribution to music :)
I just had my first live classical experience this evening, Britten's War Requiem. I loved it, and I felt a milld euphoria for a while afterward. I was thinking about how it sounded compared to different headphones.It started off sounding bright and a bit dry 
rolleyes.gif
 and then once i got used to it, it reminded m e a bit of the time I demoed the LCD3, but with more detail and  
rolleyes.gif
 imaging. 

 
Funny thing is, although I've been exposed to classical since a young age and have performed more pieces than I can remember back in the day, I never took the time to familiarize myself with much of the background info. I could hear something and recognize it, but then have no clue about the composer or title.
 
Can't wait to properly record my own music someday! I have thousands of incomplete songs in my head in all sorts of styles, and some recorded in demo form just so I don't forget them.
 
It's interesting how there are so many sounds out there, both in real life and in headphone signatures. Live acoustic performances span the gamut from dark to bright.
 
Jun 5, 2016 at 12:55 AM Post #5 of 17
   
Funny thing is, although I've been exposed to classical since a young age and have performed more pieces than I can remember back in the day, I never took the time to familiarize myself with much of the background info. I could hear something and recognize it, but then have no clue about the composer or title.
 
Can't wait to properly record my own music someday! I have thousands of incomplete songs in my head in all sorts of styles, and some recorded in demo form just so I don't forget them.
 
It's interesting how there are so many sounds out there, both in real life and in headphone signatures. Live acoustic performances span the gamut from dark to bright.

That must be so nice to have that background! Good luck with your recording plans.

And good point about how live music can be either bright or dark. I guess so many things can affect that: room acoustics, amplification, instruments, styles of play and the style of music itself. I don't know if I've ever heard a live show that sounded dark but I am not very experienced.
 
Jun 5, 2016 at 1:18 AM Post #6 of 17
We must take into account that all reproduced music is an illusion to live music. Maybe the purest form of music would be real acoustic instruments performed in a close to perfect sound aborbing room, with no reflections.

Live concerts and even perfectly constucted concert halls have color. We are given bass which we can feel both live and in loud home speaker stereos. Also the field aspect is different as speakers and concerts have the sound coming from the front not the side. After hearing both the R-10 by Sony and the Sennheiser HD800 hooked up to world class front ends, I have to say I don't want transparent. I'm looking for color and detail together. Sometimes less color and sometimes more. This is the reason I have a bunch of amps and different headphones. Some are messed up and some are a little less messed up.
 
Jun 5, 2016 at 1:25 AM Post #7 of 17
And good point about how live music can be either bright or dark. I guess so many things can affect that: room acoustics, amplification, instruments, styles of play and the style of music itself. I don't know if I've ever heard a live show that sounded dark but I am not very experienced.

 
I'd say the recording techniques are just as influential on the final sound in the recording. I mentioned close-miking earlier. If the microphones are all placed close to the instruments, it's going to sound different than if they were placed further away. It's something to try to always remember, since this is such a common practice. It's sort of like comparing your one set of ears in the audience to dozens of "virtual" ears placed near every instrument. You don't get that level of detail under normal circumstances, so in a way it's cool, but on the other hand, it's less realistic because it's hyperrealistic. So when you compare how a headphone sounds to how real instruments sound, all this can obscure what is really going on. In some cases, it may not be the fault of the headphone, but the recording. Regardless, I always recommend equalizing headphones and speakers to get the most accurate frequency response possible in order to eliminate (or perhaps I should say simplify) at least one variable in the equation. When the sound coming out of your system is less colored, it gives you better insights.
 
Jun 6, 2016 at 7:05 PM Post #8 of 17
I recently read someone comparing HD800s to an audeze can say that the planar magnetic one sounds like an instrument, whereas the HD800 merely sounds like a very good headphone. Which would the perfect headphone sound like? An instrument, or just a very clear window?
 
Jun 6, 2016 at 7:25 PM Post #9 of 17
  I recently read someone comparing HD800s to an audeze can say that the planar magnetic one sounds like an instrument, whereas the HD800 merely sounds like a very good headphone. Which would the perfect headphone sound like? An instrument, or just a very clear window?

 
That's a pretty vague question. The perfect headphone would reproduce the recording accurately. How that would sound would depend on the recording. But no headphone is perfectly accurate. All have colorations and compromises. We all have our preferences. Having heard a little bit of everything, I prefer electrostats the most, because they sound the closest to real instruments to me, while other headphone types sound like they are influencing the sound more—again, to me. Others' experiences may differ. You'll have to come to your own conclusion on what sounds best to you.
 
By the way! How did I miss that you own the iFi micro iDSD and HD 800?! That's one combo I'd like to get in the coming months. (But I would extensively equalize it.)
 
I also owned the HE400i. (Mentioning it since you do too.) Mine was modified. Even driven from the Schiit Fulla, I thought it sounded nearly as good as the HE1000 driven by the 430 HA and HDVD 800! That's impressive considering the drastic difference in price.
 
Jun 6, 2016 at 7:39 PM Post #10 of 17
   
That's a pretty vague question. The perfect headphone would reproduce the recording accurately. How that would sound would depend on the recording. But no headphone is perfectly accurate. All have colorations and compromises. We all have our preferences. Having heard a little bit of everything, I prefer electrostats the most, because they sound the closest to real instruments to me, while other headphone types sound like they are influencing the sound more—again, to me. Others' experiences may differ. You'll have to come to your own conclusion on what sounds best to you.
 
By the way! How did I miss that you own the iFi micro iDSD and HD 800?! That's one combo I'd like to get in the coming months. (But I would extensively equalize it.)
 
I also owned the HE400i. (Mentioning it since you do too.) Mine was modified. Even driven from the Schiit Fulla, I thought it sounded nearly as good as the HE1000 driven by the 430 HA and HDVD 800! That's impressive considering the drastic difference in price.

I haven't heard electrostatic headphones. Out of my price range for the time being so I'm trying not to think about what a blue hawaii and sr 009 would sound like. From what I hear, the HD800 can rival the many of the cheaper electrostatics in transparency anyway.
 
I just got the HD800 and I'm still in the break-in phase. It's what prompted me to ask this question, because I find it very transparent, and I'm wondering if the euphonics of the 400i is more of a crutch than a blessing. I'm still not sure about that.  I've heard that the HE-K has a somewhat similar signature to the 400i, though I know some don't agree with that. I found that the schiit fulla added a pleasant softness and airiness to the 400i compared to the more reference idsd. I think I will keep both headphones because they are so totally different to each other in their approach to what recordings should sound like. I haven't heard anything do Steely Dan's more raucous tracks as well as my 400i, but there is a whole layer of detail on both ends of the FR that it tries to gloss over.
 
Jun 6, 2016 at 7:48 PM Post #11 of 17
  I haven't heard electrostatic headphones. Out of my price range for the time being so I'm trying not to think about what a blue hawaii and sr 009 would sound like. From what I hear, the HD800 can rival the many of the cheaper electrostatics in transparency anyway.
 
I just got the HD800 and I'm still in the break-in phase. It's what prompted me to ask this question, because I find it very transparent, and I'm wondering if the euphonics of the 400i is more of a crutch than a blessing. I'm still not sure about that.  I've heard that the HE-K has a somewhat similar signature to the 400i, though I know some don't agree with that. I found that the schiit fulla added a pleasant softness and airiness to the 400i compared to the more reference idsd. I think I will keep both because they are so totally different to each other in their approach to what recordings should sound like. I haven't heard anything do Steely Dan's more raucous tracks as well as my 400i, but there is a whole layer of detail on both ends of the FR that it tries to gloss over.

 
Nah, you can get electrostatic systems for as low as a few hundred dollars, and electret systems are sometimes available for under $100. The used market is your friend.
 
I've only heard the HD 800 for a few hours on some high-end systems, and without EQ, so I can't comment on its ultimate capabilities firsthand. All I can say is that based on what I heard so far, my STAX SR-207 sounded more neutral and transparent to me, but less technically capable in certain categories. I wouldn't be too surprised if the HD 800 won in every category after equalization.
 
Yes, lushness and smoothing over detail are things I dislike about some planar magnetic headphones. However, the Abyss and HE6 are less like that and have a more direct and straightforward sound, in my opinion.
 
Jun 12, 2016 at 1:02 AM Post #12 of 17
   
That's a pretty vague question. The perfect headphone would reproduce the recording accurately. How that would sound would depend on the recording. But no headphone is perfectly accurate. All have colorations and compromises. 

I like the question because I suspect there is something of an uncanny valley in sound reproduction. Would a given person experience a perfect headphone as an instrument, as something essentially human and comfortable, like an LCD3, or would they experience it as some kind of sound teleportation VR device, as a totally convincing auditory illusion? And if it was the latter, could they get used to it eventually? 
 
Jun 12, 2016 at 2:31 AM Post #13 of 17
  I like the question because I suspect there is something of an uncanny valley in sound reproduction. Would a given person experience a perfect headphone as an instrument, as something essentially human and comfortable, like an LCD3, or would they experience it as some kind of sound teleportation VR device, as a totally convincing auditory illusion? And if it was the latter, could they get used to it eventually? 

 
I don't see the difference between "instrument" and "teleportation VR device" in this context. They are subjective descriptions and can potentially mean the same thing.
 
Jun 12, 2016 at 7:24 PM Post #14 of 17
  I recently read someone comparing HD800s to an audeze can say that the planar magnetic one sounds like an instrument, whereas the HD800 merely sounds like a very good headphone. Which would the perfect headphone sound like? An instrument, or just a very clear window?

 
imo one that that best replicates the SQ of the album heard in the studio. 
 
i love live music for the experience, enjoyment and energy not the sound (which can actually be pretty crappy sometimes lol)
 
i like to keep them both as a separate experience.
 
Jun 12, 2016 at 10:43 PM Post #15 of 17
   
i love live music for the experience, enjoyment and energy not the sound (which can actually be pretty crappy sometimes lol)
 
i like to keep them both as a separate experience.

Now that I've heard what a live concert hall sounds like for orchestral music, I'm going to be trying to replicate that forever.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top