iscorpio71
500+ Head-Fier
Hello Forum!
I sent a couple of month ago two iem (UM3X and TripleFi5) to inearz and inearcentral respectively.
Right of the bat both cost the same, so no difference there. But inearcentral charges the money upfront while inearz charge you when they're about to ship! so that is a better, more professional treatment if you ask me.
Ear impressions, inearz gives a .pdf instruction to take to the audiologist, inearcentral gives the option of an impression kit, which i bought to see it but did not use. Because I think is irresponsible to do so. You MUST go to an audiologist to have professional impressions, not only will they be better but also they have the experience and equipment to see before hand your inner ear canal and detect any issue, whatever it may be, as simple as wax clot, which is very common and DANGEROUS to have an impression made if you do have one because it could damage the tympanic membrane.
Time! we all want to have our iem asap. I sent them with a ten day of difference, first to inearcentral and guess what, inearz returned them 5 weeks! before inearcentral.
Inearcentral emails stating that their time is 8 weeks, but really is closer to 12 aka Three Months.
Fit and finish. Inearz by far is much better than Inearcentral not only the look but the FIT! they also print the model and number. I had to return them because the right ear hurt / pressure a little, but they were very expedited and returned in less than a week with non hurting fit.
Inearcentral fit is just terrible! loose and the shape of the monitor is wedge! meaning the Tragus sits deeper than the Helix, so in order to have seal I have to push them, both! to properly get them to sound and isolate as they suppose to.
I recommend Inearz by FAR. so if you're deciding between this two companies go with INEARZ. and Im basing this with experience, I do not work or have any relation with neither company.
Pictures: seems self explanatory.



I sent a couple of month ago two iem (UM3X and TripleFi5) to inearz and inearcentral respectively.
Right of the bat both cost the same, so no difference there. But inearcentral charges the money upfront while inearz charge you when they're about to ship! so that is a better, more professional treatment if you ask me.
Ear impressions, inearz gives a .pdf instruction to take to the audiologist, inearcentral gives the option of an impression kit, which i bought to see it but did not use. Because I think is irresponsible to do so. You MUST go to an audiologist to have professional impressions, not only will they be better but also they have the experience and equipment to see before hand your inner ear canal and detect any issue, whatever it may be, as simple as wax clot, which is very common and DANGEROUS to have an impression made if you do have one because it could damage the tympanic membrane.
Time! we all want to have our iem asap. I sent them with a ten day of difference, first to inearcentral and guess what, inearz returned them 5 weeks! before inearcentral.
Inearcentral emails stating that their time is 8 weeks, but really is closer to 12 aka Three Months.
Fit and finish. Inearz by far is much better than Inearcentral not only the look but the FIT! they also print the model and number. I had to return them because the right ear hurt / pressure a little, but they were very expedited and returned in less than a week with non hurting fit.
Inearcentral fit is just terrible! loose and the shape of the monitor is wedge! meaning the Tragus sits deeper than the Helix, so in order to have seal I have to push them, both! to properly get them to sound and isolate as they suppose to.
I recommend Inearz by FAR. so if you're deciding between this two companies go with INEARZ. and Im basing this with experience, I do not work or have any relation with neither company.
Pictures: seems self explanatory.