Quote:
Originally Posted by HONEYBOY /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Also don't forget that paradox that's so often reiterated around these audio circles that the best gears don't just wow you on first listening experiences.
|
Hmm, first I've heard of that. A lot of my favorite hardware has been products that have instantly impressed me. There was always that sense of "these things are special" to a lot of the better audio gear I've ever run, head-fi or not.
The problem for most people is the concept of personal preference and automatic bias of that preference. Most folks don't understand that they are in fact very biased listeners. Some people like a lot of bass. Some like lots of highs. Some like to see a very dynamic presentation. Others like a very laid back presentation. It's like pizza. Everyone doesn't like the same stuff.
In order to proper evaluate, judge, or review a product, the person needs to be very self aware of their own bias. They need to understand how their preferences influence their experience. It's easy to say "these headphones suck," but it's hard to say exactly why. It's hard to say that they suck because if personal bias or because they fundamentally do something wrong. Typically when I review hardware or give comments, I try and keep personal bias out of it. I comment on fundamental design and fundamental problems. If a headphone has a 6dB bump at 100Hz and a 3dB cut at 2kHz, that's what it has. It isn't fundamentally bad, but the end sound will have a certain presentation that will fit certain preferences and offend other preferences. The headphone isn't bad because of this. It functions perfectly fine within its gearing. If a headphone has muddy bass where notes lack control and definition, i.e. more noise then real information, then the headphone is in fact fundamentally flawed. You can criticize this because the headphone actually does something wrong. This is a hard distinction to make for most people, including people very well aware of this concept. EVERY headphone will sound different. No one headphone will ever be absolutely perfect to your specific set of preferences. The goal is to find one that's very close that you can be happy with. The goal is also to recognize when a headphone is fundamentally good but also a poor match to your personal preferences. If this is the case, there just isn't a place for criticism other then stating that they didn't fit well to your preferences, that you prefer less bass and more mids and highs. These are just not errors but rather a "poor fit" to your tastes in sound.
So where does the IE8 stand? Just a matter of preference? Or does the IE8 fundamentally function wrong?