iBasso DX100 Reference DAP - ES9018 inside

Jan 11, 2012 at 7:46 PM Post #1,111 of 2,799


Quote:
I'm considering a TF10 reshell from kozee. But I wonder if it will have the ability to unlock the potential of DX100?! Or maybe DX100 needs a higher grade CIEMs to open up and shine. Any suggestions?
 



While I'm positive the DX1000 will be the bomb, I and we for that matter, won't know how it will perform until it is released. I am positive it will sound great though on the TF10s. The thing about the Custom TF10s is that they are the best value in the Custom triple driver segment. So I don't see how you could lose out on that. I am also getting mine reshelled right now by Inearz. I of course think there are other Customs out there that will scale better but with that comes a bigger price. So with the price in mind I say go for it. Its like getting your feet wet in the Custom IEM scene and learning to swim before you drown yourself lol :).
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 8:00 PM Post #1,112 of 2,799
Hey kiteki,
   
      Did you happen to try Jh3A, I've been trying really hard to get someone's imressions about them, I have pico slim and I was wondering how they compare to pico slim overall thanks.


 
Quote:
I'm not disputing that. :)

 

It's a demo unit, I listened to JH11, JH13 and JH16 yesterday, I've also heard UM Aero, UM Mage, UM Merlin, UM Miracle, ACS T1.
 
I recommend JH11, JH16, UM Mage and UM Miracle.
 
 
 
Sony EX600, EX700, Audio Technica CK10, etc.
 



 
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 8:14 PM Post #1,113 of 2,799
Quote:
Hey kiteki,
   
      Did you happen to try Jh3A, I've been trying really hard to get someone's imressions about them, I have pico slim and I was wondering how they compare to pico slim overall thanks.
 


No I didn't, plus it's really expensive and 'only an amplifier' so I'm not very interested. :)
 
The JH11 or JH16 (I can't recall which) sounded better directly from my T51 HO than from the Pico Slim.
 
The PFE232 has a stupid iPhone jack so I had to use the Pico Slim.
 

 
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM Post #1,114 of 2,799


Quote:
No I didn't, plus it's really expensive and 'only an amplifier' so I'm not very interested. :)
 
The JH11 or JH16 (I can't recall which) sounded better directly from my T51 HO than from the Pico Slim.
 
The PFE232 has a stupid iPhone jack so I had to use the Pico Slim.
 

 

What do you think of the PFE232? That phone has also peaked my interest. Just would be worried if it has treble spikes :(
 
 
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 8:19 PM Post #1,115 of 2,799


Quote:
No I didn't, plus it's really expensive and 'only an amplifier' so I'm not very interested. :)
 



Unless Jerry Harvey and others are feeding us total BS, its not 'only an amplifier'. With the exception of the ZO, I know of no other device which will process analog out and dramatically improve the end result - naturally, that is FWIR.
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 8:27 PM Post #1,116 of 2,799
Quote:
lol somewhere in China? Finished a while ago. Does that mean forever stuck in customs?


Something like that.

 
 
Quote:
Unless Jerry Harvey and others are feeding us total BS, its not 'only an amplifier'. With the exception of the ZO, I know of no other device which will process analog out and dramatically improve the end result - naturally, that is FWIR.


FWIR, they only sell it with the JH16?  I thought it was a specifically tuned amplifier, with optimal sound for the application.
 
JH16 is already heroin, there's no need to go looking for a purer, less diluted source.
 
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 8:31 PM Post #1,117 of 2,799
I listened to the JH3A at RMAF using CLAS out and was not impress at all.  It is not bad but it did not strike me as something special either.  For the asking price, I am expecting something special.  I feel like a CLAS + pico Slim sounds just about the same as the JH3A.  The reason why there is so little review is because there are not that many sales and personally I don't think people are that excited about it especially after that long ordeal and final changes of design.  It is something that is very hard to audition prior to buy into and once you committed your money into the system, it is very hard to sell because it is custom made to you and you only.
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 8:36 PM Post #1,118 of 2,799
Quote:
 
 
What do you think of the PFE232? That phone has also peaked my interest. Just would be worried if it has treble spikes :(
 


One of the best universals that exist, and it has different filters (I only used the neutral filter), still... I think it's too expensive, however with Final Audio I think their prices are fine... I don't understand how I can think this.
 
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 8:38 PM Post #1,119 of 2,799


Quote:
One of the best universals that exist, and it has different filters (I only used the neutral filter), still... I think it's too expensive, however with Final Audio I think their prices are fine... I don't understand how I can think this.
 


Yeah $600.00 is quite exorbitant. Now if it was in the $300.00 range I would consider it.
 
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 9:08 PM Post #1,120 of 2,799


Quote:
I listened to the JH3A at RMAF using CLAS out and was not impress at all.  It is not bad but it did not strike me as something special either.  For the asking price, I am expecting something special.  I feel like a CLAS + pico Slim sounds just about the same as the JH3A.  The reason why there is so little review is because there are not that many sales and personally I don't think people are that excited about it especially after that long ordeal and final changes of design.  It is something that is very hard to audition prior to buy into and once you committed your money into the system, it is very hard to sell because it is custom made to you and you only.



Its my understanding that Jerry has revised the design since then, and you can now plug your customs into the JH3A via an adapter. For all that, I dont find any of the latest update on the Facebook page encouraging or in any way confidence building.
 
http://www.facebook.com/notes/jh-audio/jh3a-update/10150106149997283
 
The tone of that seems like it was a half-baked idea from the start - happy to hear otherwise.
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 11:42 PM Post #1,121 of 2,799
I am equally excited about the DX100. 
if this product could takes away my
 
iPod 160Gb + ALO alogr. Solo to connect to ALO Continental Amp.
 
Questions is 
 
1. is the DAC chip at DX100 more superior than that of ALO's ? to yield better sound ?
2. a stupid question... does it connect to Macbook and how do I transfer the apple lossless file to DX100 ?
3. Price is reasonable enough to stay below $450?
 
Just check the Ibasso web site , seem like it is not launch yet . 
 
Anyone can provide answer to my questions above ?
 
Thanks 
Raymond Lim
 
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 11:53 PM Post #1,122 of 2,799


Quote:
I am equally excited about the DX100. 
if this product could takes away my
 
iPod 160Gb + ALO alogr. Solo to connect to ALO Continental Amp.
 
Questions is 
 
1. is the DAC chip at DX100 more superior than that of ALO's ? to yield better sound ?
2. a stupid question... does it connect to Macbook and how do I transfer the apple lossless file to DX100 ?
3. Price is reasonable enough to stay below $450?
 
Just check the Ibasso web site , seem like it is not launch yet . 
 
Anyone can provide answer to my questions above ?
 
Thanks 
Raymond Lim
 


Your questions will automatically be answered when the product is released in due course.
 
 
Jan 11, 2012 at 11:59 PM Post #1,123 of 2,799
If the price is anything like $450, I expect that you will be killed in the rush to buy this thing. 
eek.gif

 
Theoretically, the DAC chip is superior to the chip in your CLAS (happy to hear otherwise ...) - its a chip that is normally employed in high-end desktop DACs costing thousands of dollars.
 
Finally, you will connect the DX100 to your Macbook with a USB cable for data transfer - at this stage, iBasso are saying that it wont function as a standalone DAC from your laptop. I have no idea if the DX100 has support for Apple Lossless. Previously, I have used Foobar2K to convert my ALAC files to WAV, then converted the results from that to FLAC - its long winded, but I think most of the ALAC-FLAC conversion utilities are, at best, trialware and I hate nag screens.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top