I don't mean to use the 's' word but I need to build an amp for..
Mar 26, 2006 at 2:21 PM Post #16 of 26
Quote:

Will all these high power amps use MOSFETS, that is to say are discreet power transistors out of the question? I still need to educate myself in this area. (so much to do!)


the Bongiorno and Leach designs are bipolar output and to my knowledge neither has ever done anything in mosfets.erno borbely on the other hand does nothing but for an output stage and for the ultimate examples of Mosfets look to nelson Pass but with the twist of always in class-A,and for good reasons.

There is a thing known as "the mosfet haze" which is a slight softening of the upper registers when used in a class A/B stage andwhile pleasant is not exactly accurate so you are losing resolution in the treble.Where mosfets have an advantage in an output stage and why you see so many in the pro arena is they do not exibit thermal runaway as does a bipolar resistor so the output is easier to design and protection circuitry is not needed (and with it the questionable sonics introduced
wink.gif
)

So for this reason the best of the high power amps use a bipolar transistor output and have multiple parallel devices to get the required VA output and SAO (Safe Area of Operation).
Also,bipolars rule at current gain,fets/mosfets at voltage gain so a class-a jfet front end to a class-a bipolar driver section to a high bias class A/B bipolar output section is a pretty good path (see Bryston schematics).

Then there is the path taken by Nelson Pass.He has discovered (?) that the mosfet output section limitations are eliminated entirely if the devices are kept in the class-A region for the entire operation.
Being the least efficient method of biasing (though best sonics !) known to humans it is expensive and a mini heat generator as much as it is amplifier so even a 10W amplifier in full class-a will be as big as,and use heat sinks as large as a typical 200W A/B amp.imagine trying for 200W pure class-a and the expenses involved !

So that is my "mini lesson" on amp topology as I understand it
tongue.gif


Quote:

There's this "simple" thing too : http://sound.westhost.com/project101.htm . The good thing with it is in the PCB and support. Lots of details on diyaudio


.

Quote:

The recent buzz in Diyaudio is in the Solid State forum. A new kit amp call Simple Killer Amp by Greg (or amplifierguru) of Australia. He offer fully populate pcb or unbuild kit for 150W and 300W power amp at resonable price. You will find endless discussion over Diyaudio and some over audiocircle.


you guys may have noticed,maybe not,that I never reference a design that is not only well documented but has an extensive build history over time to any new to DIY.
While "new" may in fact be fine it is my opinion the cicuits that have not only been built by many,not only have extensive personal build pages,but that have stood the test of time are the only way to go out of the gate until you know enough about amps to look at a design and know if it is for you or not.I have seen many "fad" amps come and go yet also notice a few are built over and over and over and that for decades.
This says a lot about the amp and why I consider the 1976 Leach "Low T.I.M." amp to be a keeper.It is fully balanced from the input to the output,has a serious online document library,is a topology still used in the high end of audio,does not use exotic parts to get it to sound good,is a straight forward build on a standard chassis using standard heat sinks and finally,has a long history of building without a single "I wish I never built this,it sucks" anywhere.Pretty good recommendations



of course I personally have shifted to the dark side and no longer do transistor amps for speakers but the power,I do miss the power
icon10.gif
 
Mar 27, 2006 at 8:37 AM Post #17 of 26
Thanks so much for your time and expertise, rickcr24! It is definitely appreciated.

Because of it's bi-polar nature and all the great reviews I hear of the leach superamp I will definitely see what's involved in the construction of this amp. There is a project on DIY that will hopefully soon become a group buy but of course I could just get this built if I had the artwork.
rolleyes.gif


I've been slaving over schematics and articles and trying to come up with a design for the enclosures so my builder can get going on it.

Once I find a PCB and start ordering parts I'll setup a build project thread.
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Mar 27, 2006 at 9:13 AM Post #18 of 26
Quote:

Originally Posted by rickcr42
the Bongiorno and Leach designs are bipolar output and to my knowledge neither has ever done anything in mosfets.


Some (most? all?) of the Sumo power amps were mosfet based. I believe that James had a hand in at least some of them (generally the well regarded ones
smily_headphones1.gif
but I am not 100% sure on which were his. At any rate, they sounded good.
 
Mar 27, 2006 at 1:39 PM Post #19 of 26
My I also point out other Rod Elliott designs... his P3a amplifier is a good one that is not based on mosfets, and bridge tied can supply the power youre looking for. I'm building ths one currently but I still need to case it up. http://sound.westhost.com/project3a.htm
 
Mar 27, 2006 at 2:55 PM Post #20 of 26
Quote:

Some (most? all?) of the Sumo power amps were mosfet based.


you are correct.I totally forgot the Sumo Andromeda (even have the schemo
icon10.gif
).

But the SUMO Nine which is the best of them uses bipolars.Ultra high beta bipolats driven by an opamp (
eek.gif
eek.gif
eek.gif
eek.gif
) in a balanced bridge.The 200WPC Andromeda and a 100wpc amp (solaris ?) used the mosfets but note he used bipolars in the SAE amps and in the "new" Ampzilla 2000 series so my guess is the mosfet not his first choice in topology.

http://www.ampzilla2000.com/James_Bongiorno.html

Quote:

I've been slaving over schematics and articles and trying to come up with a design for the enclosures so my builder can get going on it.


You really can't beat standard chassis build for power amps.All the big stuff,power transformers,power supply caps,heat sink modules-all on top with all the interconnections and off board parts mounted inside.

Step A-dry fit the parts to lay it out then mark postions and drill
Step B-bolt all the "top" side parts on
Step C-flip the chassis on its side and wire it up
Step D-cage it or not,put a rack panel face on it or not,intstall in a cabinet or not-many options and my personal choice for both solid state and tube amps

On this page is the "in the box" type construction method used by most commercial amps and even has the drilling guides
icon10.gif


http://users.ece.gatech.edu/~mleach/lowtim/part2.html

http://users.ece.gatech.edu/~mleach/.../robinson2.jpg

no matter what amp you build this is a nice tidy layout and when you add the rack panel face can be put into a road cabinet also

topview.gif


more actual recommendations here :

http://users.ece.gatech.edu/~mleach/lowtim/part3.html

pcb/heat sink drill guide

http://users.ece.gatech.edu/~mleach/...cs/layouts.pdf

a power point build http://home.comcast.net/~drumboogie/FiveChannelAmp.pps


press and peel blue for making you own pcb
icon10.gif


http://www.techniks.com/

what's not to like ?
icon10.gif


http://users.ece.gatech.edu/~mleach/lowtim/
 
Mar 27, 2006 at 7:56 PM Post #21 of 26
Take a look at the Hypex UcD modules on diyaudio.com. They're basically a pre-built class-D amp that sounds very nice according to most of the folks on there. They have 180 watt, 400 watt and 700 watt versions. You'll need to build the power supply and casing for them, though.

http://www.hypex.nl/
 
Mar 27, 2006 at 8:16 PM Post #22 of 26
if going that route why not straight to a LM3886T chip amp and have done with it ?

If it is a serious amp with great sonics being desired then the T-amps have no shot at one to one with a true class-A input-driver/hugh bias Class-A/B Ouput Behemoth Amp (the 'Zillas of ampery).

cheaper by far,easier to build but not better and why so many shy from the SS high power amplifier.Not for the faint of heart of the penny pinchers
wink.gif
 
Mar 27, 2006 at 8:34 PM Post #23 of 26
Rick : there is a huge difference in between UCD modules and T-amps or chip amps. The UCD are top notch class-d amplifiers and will compete easily with /very good/ classical AB amps.

And they are not easier or cheaper to build. The power supply (especially the choice of capacitors) becomes extremely critical and the good caps required for best performances aren't cheap.
 
Mar 27, 2006 at 9:53 PM Post #24 of 26
hehe...yes I think I'll stick with the Leach, thank you.
smily_headphones1.gif


Once I figure out some of the case design aspects they can get started on waterjet cutting and such. I plan on doing and aluminum front panel, with laser engraved graphics and possibly lit acrylic pieces. VU meters are still up in the air, either digital LEDs or a more traditional needle. Can't go wrong with a classic...
rolleyes.gif


So potentially these could be standard Leach's, not necessarily Superamps, according to a few suggestions on diyaudio. :/ I'm not sure though, if it's merely to save cost I don't think it's worth it to me. Are there any negative acoustical differences with a Superamp over a LO TIM? Are they worth considering? The extra power of the Superamp is quite beneficial to me.
 
Mar 27, 2006 at 9:56 PM Post #25 of 26
strictly going on memory here (so don't hold me to it
very_evil_smiley.gif
) the original name of the Super amp was "Double Barreled" to denote the doubling up of the output stages for increased V/A capabilies so essentially it is the same amp.There may be some differences but the essence of the amp from my understanding is the same.


[size=medium]MORE POWER SCOTTY ![/size]
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top