diditmyself
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 22, 2009
- Posts
- 320
- Likes
- 10
Originally Posted by goodsound /img/forum/go_quote.gif diditmyself, I am sorry I am not able to see your point. I thought you said something about showing simulations as to how a 3-channel confuguration has an impact of this nature. |
Originally Posted by goodsound /img/forum/go_quote.gif jcx, looks like our posts crossed. There is no effect on the amount of distortion in both thd or imd whether only one channel is driven or both. I did your 'cross channel' imd test. 60hz in the left channel and 7Khz in the right channel, both at 0db. Here are the results - No Load - The 7Khz signal was found to be at -80db in the other(left) channel as well. The 60hz signal was found to be at -60db in the other(right) channel as well. There were no IMD distortion components to be found. One channel loaded - same as above. Both channels loaded - same as above + the same IMD distortion as reported in my original post! I did the same test on the Headsix and once again point to be noted is that this imd distortion is not existent at all in the Headsix. No such thing whatsoever. So what does this prove ? That the ground channel in the V6 is not isolated enough ? ... |
Originally Posted by jcx /img/forum/go_quote.gif there is still some room for other players - the GV6 appears to have a dual channel op amp where the Headsix has 2 monos? - I can't make out their part #'s |
Originally Posted by Horse /img/forum/go_quote.gif The flaw is in the active ground topology. Also sonically, as I have personally experienced -- the 3 channels introduce a degree of unnaturalness in treble and in 'space' (which I guess is why some love it), plus a certain thinness or lack of meat to vocals etc. (which is the main reason why I hate it). ![]() |
Originally Posted by Horse /img/forum/go_quote.gif That was my guess too (based on my experiences even with high current ground channel opamps). In other words, it is NOT the best topology for portable or accessible amps... |
No wonder no commercial brand uses it in such cases. |
Originally Posted by Horse /img/forum/go_quote.gif LOL true, I forgot a couple of sellers of cheapish portable amps designed by themselves. ![]() |
Originally Posted by Horse /img/forum/go_quote.gif WOW! You're speaking of power supply electrolytics precisely as if they were in the signal path... That's not exactly so, you know. |
BTW, if the dual power supplies are well regulated, I can't see how the reservoir electrolytics could become so important. ![]() |
BTW, how do people happen to want the most technically possible channel separation in a headphone amp? Headphones have their speakers coupled directly with each ear, and this already makes for a much much unnaturally exaggerated separation between the sounds coming to the R and L ears... ![]() |
Originally Posted by jcx /img/forum/go_quote.gif another test that could nail it is to do the IMD both channels loaded but with the polarity of the IMD test signal reversed in one channel |