After purchase I wasn't very pleased about the sound of the HD 600. I tried to improve it by removing the foam pad, and that made a decisive difference in clarity and smoothness, but still I wasn't happy: too much mid bass and kind of striking, though not very delicate treble.
At last, after maybe 100 hours of operation, the sound clearly improved: more low bass extension and more embedded and refined treble. Now, maybe 1000 hours later, I'm very happy with the HD 600, now equipped with a self-made cable which makes the mids and highs sound much more elegant and lively. I like their inobtrusive character – which tends to the smooth side, but nevertheless provides a very accurate reproduction – and their impressive soundstage. I wouldn't call the sound «laid-back» at all, for it absolutely doesn't hide details, just doesn't put them in the fore.
I've made some «measurement» using a tone generator and my ears as a reference. The frequency response is extended down to 40 Hz – without a significant «hump» – with a flat roll-off towards 30 or 28 Hz, which are still clearly perceivable. (The ER-4s have the same characteristic, on a slightly lower [bass] level, while the Grado SR 80 have a sharper roll-off below 40 Hz and a channel imbalance thereby.) Above 3 kHz, the level is (very) slightly lower, and there's a significant dip at 8 kHz, which may be the main reason for the impression of lack of transparency which some describe. But it is to say that the other two headphones have at least as important unevennesses (ER-4: peaks at 2.2 and around 7 kHz, Grado: deep dip between 3 and 5 kHz, followed by a treble «plateau» which abruptly ends at 13 kHz, while the other two reach over 16 kHz).
JaZZ