Hirsch
Why is there a chaplain standing over his wallet?
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2001
- Posts
- 7,826
- Likes
- 71
I just went back to the JJ's. In so doing, I noticed something interesting...one of the pins on a tube I had removed appeared bent. I took a look at the pair I was about to put in, and saw that one was bent as well (it had been in the amp before. On close inspection, one of the sockets on a tube socket had closed. The pin was still making a connection, but I wanted to reopen the socket. Couldn't do it with a jeweler's screwdriver...couldn't get enough leverage. I finally managed to find something fine enough to do the job...a small pointed metal tool not unlike an ice pick. That socket was wedged tight...as I don't use force putting anything in, it most likely came that way from the factory
Oh well, it's fixed now.
Anyway, back to the topic, I put in the JJ's and started listening from the start. The JJ's produce less volume than the stock tubes. Since I had noticed a shrunken sound stage previously, I started wondering if the JJ's were bad. About 15 minutes later, I started noticing what people like about the JJ's. About 15 minutes after that, I can definitely state that there's nothing wrong with the tubes. Gorgeous midrange, and much better bass than the stock tubes (but takes time to tighten up). The only problem was a lack of highs...I was wondering why they were missing...and then it hit me. I use the TDS passive audiophile in that system, and usually leave it on and forget about it. I turned it off, had to adjust the gain up to compensate, and there were the highs. Still not as good as I've heard, but plenty good enough.
So, there was an equipment interaction going on all along. The TDS had a synergistic effect with the Jan Phillips tubes, and had been making them sound better than they were. However, the JJ's appear to have a different frequency response, that does not seem to combine well with the TDS. I'm going to do a bit of experimenting, and see if this holds up over time. If I can keep the JJ's sounding the way they did tonight on 30 min warmup, I'll keep the TDS out of the system (which will give me the chance to use it with my speakers...could be fun)
Anyway, back to the topic, I put in the JJ's and started listening from the start. The JJ's produce less volume than the stock tubes. Since I had noticed a shrunken sound stage previously, I started wondering if the JJ's were bad. About 15 minutes later, I started noticing what people like about the JJ's. About 15 minutes after that, I can definitely state that there's nothing wrong with the tubes. Gorgeous midrange, and much better bass than the stock tubes (but takes time to tighten up). The only problem was a lack of highs...I was wondering why they were missing...and then it hit me. I use the TDS passive audiophile in that system, and usually leave it on and forget about it. I turned it off, had to adjust the gain up to compensate, and there were the highs. Still not as good as I've heard, but plenty good enough.
So, there was an equipment interaction going on all along. The TDS had a synergistic effect with the Jan Phillips tubes, and had been making them sound better than they were. However, the JJ's appear to have a different frequency response, that does not seem to combine well with the TDS. I'm going to do a bit of experimenting, and see if this holds up over time. If I can keep the JJ's sounding the way they did tonight on 30 min warmup, I'll keep the TDS out of the system (which will give me the chance to use it with my speakers...could be fun)