k3nnis
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2004
- Posts
- 72
- Likes
- 0
Hi Neil.
Any ideas how would the transit compare to a m-audio revo 7.1/5.1? Same sonic quality?
Cheers.
Kenn.
Quote:
Any ideas how would the transit compare to a m-audio revo 7.1/5.1? Same sonic quality?
Cheers.
Kenn.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilPeart These are close in terms of performance, but I'll rank them best to worst (remember they are all very good and perform very close to each other): 1. NAD 521BEE (very natural-sounding with good clarity) 2. Terratec DMX 6Fire LT (close to the NAD but lacks that last bit of naturalness) 3. Chaintech AV-710 (very close to the DMX 6Fire, but the drivers are lacking compared to the Terratec, which sounds better with resampling @ 88.1kHz than the AV-710 does @ 96kHz) 4. M-Audio Transit (very close to the above cards but is more limited in features - I use its optical output more these days; it's bit-perfect) Here are sources I own that are better than the above 3 (again in order of best to worst): 1. Benchmark DAC1 (the best source I've heard in my own system) 2. E-MU 1212M (a very good card but still cannot match the musicality and transparency of the DAC1, and the bass quality doesn't come close; the best analog output of any card I've heard IMO, but the RME has better digital out IME) 3. RME DIGI 96/8 PAD (less clear than the E-MU but the bass is better IMO; still this card is harsh in the treble; I use it as a transport for the DAC1 since it's bit-perfect with or without ASIO as it bypasses kmixer and the driver and interface are much better than E-MU's) The Transit is definitely better than: 1. Turtle Beach Santa Cruz (harsh and unresolved compared to Transit and better cards; still very good for its day; possibly the best AC97 soundcard) 2. iRiver SlimX iMP-550 (very good for what it does) 3. Creative SB Live! (pretty terrible in every regard - sound quality, drivers, interface, etc.) |