dhruvmeena96
Headphoneus Supremus
I zobel everything so everything is DC to meImpedance is always frequency related and you should use the impedance at the crossover point to be most accurate. Not the DC resistance.
I zobel everything so everything is DC to meImpedance is always frequency related and you should use the impedance at the crossover point to be most accurate. Not the DC resistance.
Ok... but even with theoretical flat impedance (which is not the case when a zobel is used, it is just more flat) impedance ≠ DC resistance.I zobel everything so everything is DC to me
I design zobel in respect to dcr nowOk... but even with theoretical flat impedance (which is not the case when a zobel is used, it is just more flat) impedance ≠ DC resistance.
So, here is the 1st version i'll call heavy 1. Couple questions:HODVTEC (internal series) L-pad 4.7obm series parallel yellow
ED29689 - green damper - 22ohm series
HODVTEC tube as long as you can fit
ED29689 10mm with green damper at 8mm
The most simple Bass shelf + diffuse feild iem
If you wanna do complex, that can be done too
HODVTEC as above
Sonion 33AJ007(internal series)
10uF 47ohm RC high pass
Red damoer at 10mm
14mm tube
Adjust electrical connection to adjust phase
Technically reverse phase.
ED29689 CT
2.2uF High pass
14mm tube
Green damper at 10mm
Again reverse phase or just check phase in FR graph
WBFK as per taste
Why did I write check electrical phase
Because in certain connection
The 33AJ will dip at 200Hz which is regular in phase with HODVTEC electrically
And uppermid will cancel on 29689 if same phase HODVTEC
As crossover shift phases
So do check, that will give you better idea as how cross behave
Regarding RC filter for still not clear - should I include driver resistance during filter calculation or not?I design zobel in respect to dcr now
Rather than 500Hz
Slight sound change while designing with DCR
But in multi driver, it just works
And works flawlessly
I design zobel in respect to dcr now
Rather than 500Hz
Slight sound change while designing with DCR
But in multi driver, it just works
And works flawlessly
i mean, for super accurate build, you have to measure every driverSo, correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding of a zobel is that it's there to correct the impedance peaks/dips. As such don't they have to kind of compliment the actual numbers of what's happening, rather than a dcr number somebody wrote on a page of specs?
I get that you simplify but why take the DCR value and not the average impedance you get of the datasheet?i mean, for super accurate build, you have to measure every driver
but it works with spec sheet value too
just ask knowles for inductance, wait for reply and they will give you some drivers sample inductances
average them all up and then work on your driver
it works, just not as neat, there would be 0.5 to 1ohm dips here and there(often at where the impedance peak was)
overall, its flat
if you measure your driver with your own rig, then it reaches damm close to flat line
but i remember once what @piotrus-g told
it the ratio of impedance points more than impedance itself
if you can get near 1:1 ratio on highest and lowest point. its good
Just to remove hassleI get that you simplify but why take the DCR value and not the average impedance you get of the datasheet?
Take this knowles CI-22955 curve for example. DCR would be roughly where i painted the red line (20Ohms). If you cross before 300-400 hz sure go ahead and use the DCR (if so you don´t need a zobel here anyway) but it is hard for me to imagine that a simple RC zobel can flaten this impedance peak out sufficiently.
Allright, i guess where are on the same page than.Just to remove hassle
I mean while crossing we can control many sound parameters
So a DCR zobel is kinda fool proof
For single driver iem
I use classic 500Hz data though
Plus the inductance of CI 22955 is 11.3 to 13mH(varying per sample)
As per knowles
That's crazy flat!Hey guys just want to share something i whipped up some time ago.
This is as flat as I can get. It's a 2-way, 3BA driver set up. fairly simple.
Doesn´t suprise me at all, our ears are quite different. The best approach to see what would sound flat to you in my opinion the Griesinger Method with pink noise.Speaking of target curves, by the time I forced my BL-03 to sound flat to my ears, attempting to add the EQ to existing measurements seems to turn its curve into a non bass rolled HD600 lookalike.
To my knowledge the Sennheiser HD600 isn't targeting ANY curve at all. And yet it apparently would sound very flat to my ears.
And yes I'm comparing that EQ'd BL-03 to a headphone because I never found an IEM equivalent of said headphone.