HiFiMAN HM-901 visit pg 18. IMGS pg 19. NEW beta FW 1st page. . to the 901s. .new 901s FW .
May 20, 2013 at 6:09 AM Post #91 of 3,445
Quote:
Jamato, as a reference, how would the dx100 fit in thr picture ? Because I find that modded ak100 easily matches the dx100 with iems, so the 901 would have to be much better than both. Maybe it depends on the mod, as for instance rwak and stage 2 sound different.


which one of the mods do you think match up with the Dx100?  The RWA or the Stage 2?
 
May 20, 2013 at 12:43 PM Post #94 of 3,445
Quote:
thats... interesting , really want to get mine modded, now I am confused between the two type of mod offered in my country


I am not saying the AK100 stage 2 is perfect. It could have more power and sometimes I find the texture of mids to metalic sounding / digital. But the DX100 also has some issues IMO in terms of SQ, and I would say that for iems, and given the 1/5 size ratio, a AK100 mod is a pretty good compromise. I need to have the 901 in hand to see if it feels less bricky than the DX100.
 
May 20, 2013 at 1:23 PM Post #96 of 3,445
Quote:
I am not saying the AK100 stage 2 is perfect. It could have more power and sometimes I find the texture of mids to metalic sounding / digital. But the DX100 also has some issues IMO in terms of SQ, and I would say that for iems, and given the 1/5 size ratio, a AK100 mod is a pretty good compromise. I need to have the 901 in hand to see if it feels less bricky than the DX100.


Same reason why I bought ak100 instead of everything else I guess, both UI and size compromise with the SQ, well I will try to get mine with the other mod, last I check that one feels more lush and smooth compared to the original
 
May 20, 2013 at 1:25 PM Post #97 of 3,445
Quote:
Same reason why I bought ak100 instead of everything else I guess, both UI and size compromise with the SQ, well I will try to get mine with the other mod, last I check that one feels more lush and smooth compared to the original


Check out stage 2 mod and the new mezzo mod, good returns on both apparently.
 
May 20, 2013 at 6:46 PM Post #102 of 3,445
I was really underwhelmed by the ak100... maybe 60% of DX100 in terms of SQ. 
While I was impressed by the 901 the first time I laid my hands on it. It is definitely better than the DX100 in almost all aspects (with a small margin, but noticable) except for airiness uptop due to the hifiman-house sounding. The more dynamic presentation and added warmth in the mids is really the no.1 feature of the 901.
I don't think the AK120 is going to surpass DX100 in terms of SQ, honestly.
 
May 21, 2013 at 5:33 AM Post #104 of 3,445
I was really underwhelmed by the ak100... maybe 60% of DX100 in terms of SQ. 
While I was impressed by the 901 the first time I laid my hands on it. It is definitely better than the DX100 in almost all aspects (with a small margin, but noticable) except for airiness uptop due to the hifiman-house sounding. The more dynamic presentation and added warmth in the mids is really the no.1 feature of the 901.
I don't think the AK120 is going to surpass DX100 in terms of SQ, honestly.
Ah, you really make me wanna wait for the 901 :laughing:
 
May 22, 2013 at 8:03 AM Post #105 of 3,445
Interested and sub'd. They must be really working hard to make things perfect, I can't explain the delay in the launch in other words.
 
Seems nice, no touchscreen, 128 gb sd card, can be upgraded with the amp card and be more suitable for iems. Also I think it can be used as USB DAC too right? I just have to connect it to my pc with usb port and plug the headphones to the player, open music from the computer and tadaaaaam, magic.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top