davehutch
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2009
- Posts
- 750
- Likes
- 362
Thank you, I agree with your thoughts almost entirely. In my case, as I don't really know any other headphone users in my social circle I can discount bragging rights.It really just comes down to your budget. My opinion is that the amount of money that must change hands to get "relatively minor" improvements (and perhaps even some things that are worse!) is not actually worth the cost at the high end, objectively.
However, if "money is not an object" ie, the difference between 1000, 2000 and 3000 doesn't matter to you "at this time" then I always suggest getting the highest end one you can get. because otherwise you'll always be thinking about it. And it's better, that's why they want more money for it.
Whether its actually worth that 1000 or 2000 more is probably "No". But if you don't care about that 1000 or it's not going to matter, then you should go for the better one. My 2 cents. Bragging rights alone are worth easily 500. right ? lol
I only got the Aryas becasue they were less than 2 grand. I have spent 3 grand on headphones a few times and I am not super keen to do it again (although probably will at some point). So to me, 1300 for their performance is a steal. That might not be the situation you're in.
I did listen to the Aryas, among half a dozen much more expensive headphones and they are currently top of my list.
As far as HFM goes, I only heard them against the HE1000 (non stealth) as they had the 2.5mm connectors so it will be interesting to hear them against the Stealth and SE versions.
The extra money wouldn't matter at this point if there was no other way to achieve the same result (or as near as makes no difference) so I'm really looking forward to Friday to hear all of them.
Thanks for your reply, but I do still wonder what makes them different to each other ?