pataburd
Headphoneus Supremus
Someone asked me to denote what I thought were the major differences between Ananda non-SM vs. SM, and this is what I have come up with so far:
The SM sound more refined.
The SM sound more detailed.
The SM sound airier.
The SM's soundstage is more coherent with better holistic integration of parts.
The SM offer a better sense of front-to-back dimensionality (and overall imaging).
The SM's tonality sounds rounder, fuller, sweeter.
The SM's timbres sound more accurate (less "artificial").
To my ears, the SM have no audible downside vs. their non-SM counterpart.
The SM sound more refined.
The SM sound more detailed.
The SM sound airier.
The SM's soundstage is more coherent with better holistic integration of parts.
The SM offer a better sense of front-to-back dimensionality (and overall imaging).
The SM's tonality sounds rounder, fuller, sweeter.
The SM's timbres sound more accurate (less "artificial").
To my ears, the SM have no audible downside vs. their non-SM counterpart.