At this point, I am pretty much a headphone only guy – and I love it. Until a couple of months ago, I had a pair of old Infinity Reference Standard 4.5, bi-amped by two Electrocompaniet 50W Class A solid state stereo power amps. But approaching twenty years of age, the speakers died. That’s about when I bought my speaker-based system: twenty years ago. If I had to choose another speaker set-up, it wouldn’t be like the one I owned. Those 4.5s were huge, power-hungry, had extremely deep and tight bass response and a huge and deeeep soundstage, due to their EMIM dipole midrange drivers. The Electrocompaniet power amps were some of the first SS amps to offer something like musicality and transparency (Electrocompaniet designers were among the first to worry about TID figures in SS amps).
But, and this is a big but: the whole set-up wasn’t all that life-like. It was very nice to listen to, but it drew a little bit too much attention to itself. In retrospect, it possessed virtues I am not all that interested in anymore. It sounded a bit like hi-fi is supposed to sound. Nowadays I can live without a huge soundstage and pinpoint imaging, as long as there is captivating music coming out of the transducer. All I am interested in now is musical pleasure. In my mind, those are polar opposites: if you want hi-fi, you listen for the sound, for specifics of the reproduction, if you want pleasure, you listen for the music as a whole, and not for the equipment. It’s just as Krakow says: the equipment is supposed to get out of the way. And that’s all it’s supposed to do. One has to be aware of this paradox: truly great equipment doesn’t add to the experience, it takes away less from it, it’s simply less damaging to the musical signal.
If I had to buy another speaker-based system today, it would likely have high-efficiency speakers. Inefficient speakers have one very basic flaw: they are unable to handle low-level signal content. It’s a bit like the tube vs. SS argument. Tubes shine at low signal levels, transistors hate them, the same is true for analog vs. digital comparisons by the way.
Speakers I am impressed with nowadays tend to be single-driver or two-way speakers with high efficiency. There have been open-baffle single-driver speakers I enjoyed listening to, but there have been two-way horn designs as well. Add to this the simplicity of a single-ended, low-powered tube amp (without multiple gain stages, lots of negative feedback or push-pull topologies) and there is a high likelihood of me enjoying the music.
That’s my rule of thumb. However, there are exceptions. At the recent “High End” exhibit in Frankfurt (the largest show of high-end audio gear in Europe), I have listened to the new (and rather inefficient) Bösendorfer speakers, with an Electrocompaniet system behind them (Electrocompaniet CDP, SS preamp and SS power amp), and the ugly truth is: I loved it. An utterly musical system. I liked it as much as the vinyl-based Audi Note UK system I listened to that day or the CDP-based Kondo Japan system (and to my ears, that means a lot) or any other 100,000+ US-Dollar system I listened to on that day.
But now for the good part: none of the speaker-based systems I heard that day gave me more musical satisfaction than my EMP/W100 combo. None.
Do I like headphones? Am I a resolution freak? Am I sick?
Are there others like me out there?