- Joined
- Apr 28, 2010
- Posts
- 1,639
- Likes
- 39
Well, maybe I'll find out come June. Not sure what to treat myself for on my birthday yet!
Well, maybe I'll find out come June. Not sure what to treat myself for on my birthday yet!
First impressions:
After listening to the Arrow for a couple hours, I think I fell in love with it.
The bass is nice and tight on bass bosst I. Bass boost II is a bit much for my liking.
Compared to my Mk II, the Arrow is more of what I would call "straight forward". It has warmer touch to it whereas the Mk II sounds kinda dark and cold. When switching back and forth between the amps, the most apparent difference is the soundstage. The soundstage and instrument separation on the Mk II is much bigger than that of the arrow.
Overall I think the arrow produces a very impressive sound for it's size. Some people might even prefer the more straight forward sound of the arrow.
You really lost me. Gen 2 or Gen 3? The Arrow is warmer but Gen '?' is darker and colder??
The one I'm talking about is Gen 3.
When I said darker and coler, I was referring to the Rx Mk II.
I usually equate darker with warmer though
I'm not very experienced at describing sound so I might be wrong. With darker and warmer I associated two different things. But I see what you mean. That would make sense as well.
Maybe I should've just said "colder". =)
Hi
I listen to rock (metal too) bands
My earphone is shure se315 ( will be se535 in future)
Which version I must chosse ( 3G or 4G)
I think 4G is better for me , what do you think?
...