kukrisna
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2005
- Posts
- 418
- Likes
- 10
Hey All,
I know I have the other thread going about an amp suggestion, but I feel compelled to start a new on regarding specifically these two.
I'm sorta stuck between which one to get, and I've seen so many different opinions in favor of one or the other, and I don't have the money to audition both, and I'm stuck in Amherst, MA in college and I can't drive so I can't get to any meets.
That being said - pros and cons:
PROS:
Headfive:
- crossfeed
- cheaper
- limited edition
Gilmore:
- loop out
- supposedly very neutral, detailed, and transparent
- optional future DPS upgrade
CONS:
Headfive:
- no loop out
- supposedly colors the sound
- needs a power cable
Gilmore:
- more expensive
- no crossfeed
CONFUSION:
What I'm wondering is whether or not the Gilmore would not complement the K501s well since, arguably, the K501s are lean, and whether or not the Headfive would do a better job balancing out the sound a bit, and adding crossfeed to balance out what I've noticed as a very wide but not deep soundstage.
I've read so many differing opinions that I really don't know what to think. It could go either way, and while I want a lot of detail, I'm also wondering if some of that should be traded to make sure that the sound doesn't become anemic.
I also have an Entech Number Cruncher 203.2 as a DAC and people have said that the highs are a bit harsh with it, which I can see.
I've never used crossfeed so I don't know how big a differenc it will make for me, but most people have generally positive comments about it, except for some diehard audiophiles who believe it taints the fidelity. And loopout isn't a biggy though it would be very ncie to have.
I don't know how to choose between the two. If the Gilmore is that much better I wouldn't mind spending the extra $50, but if I'll get more out of the Headfive then I would rather splurge on that.
Other amp options don't really appeal to me for whatever reason. I kind of don't want to get into tubes right now, and I don't really want to try out some of the DIY options. I also don't want to save up even more money.
I listen to mostly classical and jazz, but I do get around to all genres all the time. I love the K501s and the sound I currently have with them. I also love detail, imaging, and soundstage more so than other things, but I wouldn't mind sacrificing a bit of that for a very sweet midrange (I think). And it seems that both amps can give me one or the other but not both, so I don't know what to think.
Help would be GREATLY appreciated!
Thanks!
-Keith
I know I have the other thread going about an amp suggestion, but I feel compelled to start a new on regarding specifically these two.
I'm sorta stuck between which one to get, and I've seen so many different opinions in favor of one or the other, and I don't have the money to audition both, and I'm stuck in Amherst, MA in college and I can't drive so I can't get to any meets.
That being said - pros and cons:
PROS:
Headfive:
- crossfeed
- cheaper
- limited edition
Gilmore:
- loop out
- supposedly very neutral, detailed, and transparent
- optional future DPS upgrade
CONS:
Headfive:
- no loop out
- supposedly colors the sound
- needs a power cable
Gilmore:
- more expensive
- no crossfeed
CONFUSION:
What I'm wondering is whether or not the Gilmore would not complement the K501s well since, arguably, the K501s are lean, and whether or not the Headfive would do a better job balancing out the sound a bit, and adding crossfeed to balance out what I've noticed as a very wide but not deep soundstage.
I've read so many differing opinions that I really don't know what to think. It could go either way, and while I want a lot of detail, I'm also wondering if some of that should be traded to make sure that the sound doesn't become anemic.
I also have an Entech Number Cruncher 203.2 as a DAC and people have said that the highs are a bit harsh with it, which I can see.
I've never used crossfeed so I don't know how big a differenc it will make for me, but most people have generally positive comments about it, except for some diehard audiophiles who believe it taints the fidelity. And loopout isn't a biggy though it would be very ncie to have.
I don't know how to choose between the two. If the Gilmore is that much better I wouldn't mind spending the extra $50, but if I'll get more out of the Headfive then I would rather splurge on that.
Other amp options don't really appeal to me for whatever reason. I kind of don't want to get into tubes right now, and I don't really want to try out some of the DIY options. I also don't want to save up even more money.
I listen to mostly classical and jazz, but I do get around to all genres all the time. I love the K501s and the sound I currently have with them. I also love detail, imaging, and soundstage more so than other things, but I wouldn't mind sacrificing a bit of that for a very sweet midrange (I think). And it seems that both amps can give me one or the other but not both, so I don't know what to think.
Help would be GREATLY appreciated!
Thanks!
-Keith