Quote:
Originally Posted by donunus /img/forum/go_quote.gif
ASR, I"M SHOCKED hehehe
It beat the ad2000? please tell us more. I am interested to know what you will miss with the ad2000 if the rs1 becomes the one and only
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron-xp /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I'd really like to know that as well. I really liked the MS pro, but it's totally unlikely that I can get one. If the RS1 beats the AD2000 in most aspects, I may end up with an RS2, which is quite a bit cheaper.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackmore /img/forum/go_quote.gif
But why it is so surprising that RS1 beats AD2k
|
I make one simple statement and it proceeds to get misinterpreted....
I didn't say the RS1 beats the AD2000, I only said it was too early to call it a favorite above the AD2000. And I really don't like how so many people on this forum try to say that one headphone is better than another either - there are trade-offs with every headphone, no single one is perfect. There are
some aspects in which the RS1 does better than HD650, K701, or AD2000, but I definitely would not say it's better than any of them - those other three do some things the RS1 can't.
In any case the RS1 is definitely an excellent headphone, highly suitable for certain types of music as I and others have said. It maintains crystal clarity just like the K701, and in fact while listening to it, it makes me think about the K701.
But unlike the K701 it doesn't open up the soundstage, and it has more attitude and energy while retaining relatively even balance across the spectrum.
As far as versus the AD2000, there's no way I could live only with the RS1 with the music I listen to, that's for sure. Some people could, but not me, I listen to electronica way too much, and the AD2000's bass output is at the perfect level for me - deep, powerful, fast, and not boomy. The RS1's bass just isn't at the same level.