Gradofan2
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2005
- Posts
- 3,819
- Likes
- 41
To this point, I can't say... I've noticed any harshness in their highs at all. Nothing at all like that of the RS-1's, or other Grados.
Originally Posted by Gradofan2 /img/forum/go_quote.gif To this point, I can't say... I've noticed any harshness in their highs at all. Nothing at all like that of the RS-1's, or other Grados. |
Originally Posted by mbd2884 /img/forum/go_quote.gif The headphone break-in The perception theory seems most likely to me. Just doesn't seem likely a small headphone driver needs 400 hours to loosen up. Also I believe most of the high fi headphone makers claim their headphones are awsome right out of the box. Be interesting to find a headphone company that actually suggests burn-in in their manuals. I'll bet it will be hard to find. Edit: Maybe ultrasones recommend them. From these forums, people suggest ridiculous amount of burn-in time. Maybe ultrasone picked up on that. |
Originally Posted by J-Pak /img/forum/go_quote.gif I heard the GS-1000 for a long time at a hifi dealer using really nice equipment and I couldn't get over the sibilance or brightness. |
Originally Posted by fc911c /img/forum/go_quote.gif Well my guess would be thet weren't a seasoned pair. Good equipment helps but if they don't have enough play time it doesn't matter much how good it is. |
Originally Posted by J-Pak /img/forum/go_quote.gif They probably had 600+ hours on them according to him, this is one of the first things I asked before listening. I've heard a well burned in pair at a meet and came to same conclusion. I'm not the only one to think this either, lots of people sold them after the hype died down after the first national meet. edit: I used well recorded rock (DCC, MFSL), jazz (Tzadik, AP, Telarc), blues and female jazz vocals- all discs I was very familiar with. |
Originally Posted by fc911c /img/forum/go_quote.gif Well lots of people think this and lots of people don't, so who's right? Are you trying to say that the people that dissagree with you are wrong? |
Originally Posted by J-Pak /img/forum/go_quote.gif No I gave my opinion to the original poster and that's all. It seems you were the one trying to convince me with the poor assumption that they "weren't a seasoned pair". |
Originally Posted by fc911c /img/forum/go_quote.gif Well lots of people think this and lots of people don't, so who's right? Are you trying to say that the people that dissagree with you are wrong? |
Originally Posted by Bluetick /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm amazed at how many people spend so much money on gear when they haven't had a hearing test in ages. I mean a really good test that shows your response curve. I consider myself a really good listener- able to discern the slightest things. That's true for the most part, but what came as a surprise on my last check-up was a bit of scar tissue in my left ear. I assume this manifested after a verly slight rupture 2 yrs ago during an illness. You'd think that would make my hearing less responsive in a particular frequency, but the adverse is true- I have a sensitivity @ about the 7Khz range. My hearing spikes at that point and drops like a stone after about 14Khz. All of this is in the left ear, of course. The right ear is pretty much normal. What does this mean? I implemented a dreaded EQ in my main rig to drop the 7-10Khz range a bit and suddenly things sound linear and balanced. What I once considered a bit of glare coming from a pair of Raven R1's was actually my fault all along. It is with this bit of knowledge I find the reports of harsh HF in a given pair of headphones a bit amusing- or any arguement over who is right and/or potentially wrong with a judgement of any kind regarding the "absolute" fidelity of ANY product. We are indeed all unique and so is our hearing. We also have many unique audio "goals". |
Originally Posted by Ruckus /img/forum/go_quote.gif What a great point. I would never have thought to get my ears tested in order to tweak the Audio equipment for better audio pleasure. |