MonkCanatella
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Posts
- 46
- Likes
- 11
I would take that review with a gargantuan bag of salt. His claim that the m9XX's crossfeed impacts the frequency response have been empirically disproven. And I've not seen anybody else claim that its soundstage is wider yet shallower than the modi 2 Uber. The only difference I notice between the M2U and m9XX in the DAC section is the m9XX being a bit more transparent. Like a crazy subtle amount more, but it is there, to my ears. To me the soundstage is indifferentiable between the two. Imaging accuracy is a tiny bit better on the m9XX to my ears because of the greater transparency.
One additional issue is that this will vary more dependent on your computer's USB port, as the Modi has no process for eliminating noise from a mediocre USB port (ie something that performs the function of the Wyrd), while the m9XX does. If you have an issue with a crappy USB port, the m9XX could sound dramatically better. On my macbook pro that wasn't an issue I personally had with the Modi though.
Cool thanks. I read your review and I'm closer to jumping on the bandwagon. I also found a direct comparison to the ZDAC V.2 from project86's review.
The Parasound Zdac V2 ($549) is a very enjoyable DAC. It falls on the warm and smooth side, with a dynamic punch that may exceed what the m9XX can offer. In contrast, the Grace unit is more resolving, cleaner, and more airy in tone, with a more precise soundstage and accurate imaging. I really like both models and would choose among them based on what associated gear makes up the system.
One difference between the two is that the ZDAC works with balanced XLR cables while not supported on the m9xx. I'm wondering if the balanced xlr output on the back of the zdac is meant for headphone use or not though.
I'll probably be going with the M9xx because I plan on grabbing a pair of th-x00s soon as they drop again. Plus it'll probably sound good with my R2As as well.