Quote:
Originally Posted by donunus /img/forum/go_quote.gif
hoy big ban, lami kaayo ang ad2k, kung tagalog pa pag sulti, sulit talaga, tang ina pare, they kick ass!
|
Oh I'm sorry, I don't really speak Tagalog. I only remember a few phrases because I had a Filipina girlfriend a few years ago
Quote:
Originally Posted by donunus /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I've noticed that they change their fun factor with different sources namely the ipod compared to my pc to my headfive. They really synergize well with the ipod compared to the laptop while the 595s are opposite and do really well with the laptops headphone jack to the headfive combo. Point is that I really love them and the only thing I noticed was that they changed more from source to source than any other of my cans did.
What source/amp combo have you tried best with them?
|
I'm currently using them out of my Terratec Phase X24FW as source, but its DAC is as good as any DAC at a certain level in my opinion. I've done an A/B Test directly comparing the Phase's DAC with the Corda Aria's internal DAC and there is 0 difference between the two. This can be done by synchronizing two Media Players (both using ASIO). Each of the two players outputs the playback of the same song to one sound device and then with the flip switch on the Aria you can switch directly between USB input and analog input. There is no lag when switching back and forth, no volume difference, there is also no audible difference at all.
My conclusion is that at a certain level there's no significant change in DAC quality. There may be some who object to this, but I frankly don't care because I know what I've heard and I've learned that fiddling with DACs isn't worth the hassle. Once you've reached a certain level of course. My old soundcard was clearly not at the level of my current DACs (though not bad at all).
Same applies to headphone amps. I would advise you not to worry to much about amps, the AD2000 isn't especially picky. It even sounds good out of a humble MP3 stick - or ipod, as you mentioned.
I own (as you already know) the Corda Aria and the AT-HA20. I've recently had a mini meet with three hifi friends of mine and we did some A/B double blind tests with various equipment. And guess what: none of us could reliably and repeatedly tell the difference between Aria and HA20 (using AD2000 and K701).
Well, there is indeed one difference: there is more background noise on the HA20, but this is only heard when no music is played anyway. If only we had listened long enough, we might have found something, but why even bother when the changes are oh so subtle?
I have the same impression of the Corda Opera. A while ago, a direct comparison to the Aria suggested that it MIGHT have sounded SLIGHTLY better than the Aria, but the difference wasn't big at all. But I didn't do proper double blind tests back then, so this could have been down to autosuggestion and preconception.
Just to let you know: I have indeed heard amps sounding worse, such as the Rega Ear (flat, compressed, boring). But otherwise I think any kind of "decent amp" will do just fine. The differences are smaller than some people actually want to make you believe.
You don't really have to go for crazy equipment to enjoy the AD2000. I don't claim to have heard all the amps out there, but my comparisons so far have led me to believe that there isn't much room for improvement left.
I think it's safe to say I've become a hifi realist. Endless raving about tiny difference is obsolete to me. As long as the differences aren't significant and apparent, it doesn't affect my enjoyment anyway.
Benjamin