valve5425
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
- Posts
- 69
- Likes
- 25
It is worth reminding ourselves every so often that we chose to save money by taking on risks in production/fulfillment schedule and ultimately delivery at all. I'm not concerned that they won't deliver since they have on previous projects, but we decided to pay money for a product that didn't exist and that we didn't get to hear or test, all for the chance to spend less than retail.
Some risks pay off, like reaching funding goals that result in upgrades or free cables. When I pledged for an original vanilla pulse, I had lower expectations for the product I would receive than the one they have put together subsequently. Some risks don't pay off, like the manufacturing timeline being delayed or shipping being affected by strikes.
But to accept only the positive risk payoffs and reject the negatives after willfully engaging in a risky transaction from the start rather than buying a more expensive product off the shelf seems intellectually dishonest. We are funding the development and creation of a product from the ground up and going along for the ride with all delays, mistakes, surprises, or disasters that result.
That said, I'm really looking forward to getting my stuff and would appreciate clearer setting of expectations and communication.
Thank you Ebonyzer, that was beautifully stated. People are impatient and it is unfortunate that some become obnoxious and abusive when they don't get what they want when they want. I see this a lot recently in the LH Labs forum and more than enough here too.
I am a fairly patient person and have waited over a year for other products that I have heard about and wanted, so the wait for the Pulse is not a new thing except for the little detail of having already paid for it. This crowd funding thing and our involvement in the development process is different and quite interesting.
That said, my patience is wearing thin and I am torn between having the newest and possibly best DAC chip version and having my Pulse X∞ a month or two earlier. I am sure that either way my Pulse will be excellent and I do wonder if I could even hear the difference between the two DAC chips in a direct A/B comparison. I joined in the campaign Nov. 13 2013 so it has been quite a wait. I guess we will just have to see what LH Labs decides to do and I will be happy with the results either way.
J.P.
Sensible responses which I wholeheartedly agree with. Whilst it would be great to have the latest chip, I look at the journey we've had getting the Pulse to where it is now, and wonder if it's worth the hassle. After all, who's to say the new chip will make any discernible improvement. Unless it's implemented and compared to the old chip, nobody knows, and how long would that take with all the other projects chugging along. I can't see this being done for free either, it's just too much work, so do we get to the stage where we shell out more cash to add yet another pulse variant to the list?
Just wait for Pulse Mk 2 to hit the shelves in twelve months or so, and buy that!