Supa Mint
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2015
- Posts
- 67
- Likes
- 20
Well from what I've observed most guitars have a lot of body around 150-500hz, and the drop is barely at 500hz. So it may not be too bad, just a slight distance in harmonics
Now that I think about it, the Purplehearts probably won't be "better" or more appropriate for rock/metal than the Mahoganies in any area other than bass. It could be somewhat track dependent though because of the different peaks and troughs. Purplehearts seem a bit more smooth/refined and bassy though. Probably more soundstage cause of the midrange drop.
You probably can't go wrong with either unless you need that higher low midrange, then Mahoganies.
I'm another one that wouldn't be happy if the electric guitars were recessed. But if they're found in the 150 - 500hz range, then the graph (assuming that the purple line is for the Purplehearts) shows that the Purplehearts may offer a more forward presentation than the mahoganies in this range.
But I'm not sure how to reconcile this graph with the statements found in the Purpleheart Massdrop description:
"...The lower midrange is decreased by ~5 dB, and while the mahogany version had a slight peak at ~600 Hz, the purpleheart has a smoother climb from 500 to 1000 Hz. The midrange proper is essentially identical to that of the mahogany, the upper midrange is ~2 dB less throughout, and the highs are slightly more emphasized. Peaks and valleys are positioned differently than on the mahogany, but their magnitude is similar. As for the super highs, while the mahogany falls off at ~14 kHz, the purpleheart maintains presence through that range."
To me, I'm reading that the Purpleheart lower midrange is ~5 db lower than the mahogany; and that the Purpleheart midrange proper is identical to the mahogany; and that the Purpleheart upper midrange is ~2 db lower than the mahogany.
Where am I misreading all of this information?
Thanks for the clarification!