- Joined
- Jun 24, 2009
- Posts
- 3,244
- Likes
- 923
Ah, but the people who have the money tend to also be the people who care whether or not their headphones are made out of popsicle sticks or not (for shallow aesthetic reasons of course).
So your not winning like Charlie Sheen at this moment?
So got a question about the TH900s vs HD800s.. The 800s and the Stax 009s are really the only 2 headphones I want in my arsenal besides the TH900s.
I've tried the HD800s a few times but never for long sessions.. how is the comfort level between the two (I find the TH900s very comfortable for long sessions , but I tend to prefer velvet/non leather pads when available). Thoughts?
So got a question about the TH900s vs HD800s.. The 800s and the Stax 009s are really the only 2 headphones I want in my arsenal besides the TH900s.
I've tried the HD800s a few times but never for long sessions.. how is the comfort level between the two (I find the TH900s very comfortable for long sessions , but I tend to prefer velvet/non leather pads when available). Thoughts?
I didn't say form and function are mutually exclusive.
A coat can be both warm and fashionable (or even beautiful) and headphones can be both beautiful and sound superb. No argument there.
In the context of the funtionality of the coat: If I ask for a coat to keep me warm, because I'm cold, I don't want to get the advice to "get this one, because it is the most beautiful coat ever made". I don't care if it is beautiful, it must keep me warm. It will never keep me warm because it's beautiful, (altough maybe I'll find it beautiful because it keeps me warm). The beauty can be there or not, it is irrelevant, the fact that it will keep me warm is the only relevant aspect.
I don't think the TH900 sound better because they have red Urushi lacquered cups and platinum lettering.... The two facts are simply not related, they don't influence each other, they just coexist on the TH900.
No longer have the HD800s, but from what I recall they were the most comfortable headphones I had owned. Better than the th900 IMO. Just could not get past the juice extractor looks, treble peak and the need for top level ancillaries to hear them at their best. When I owned both I preferred the th900 overall and by a surprisingly wide margin given that I really liked the HD800.
thanks for the info - I figure I will enjoy the TH900s more, but the HD800s bring a completely different style to the table (need to spend more time with them i guess). As for the 009s, itll be a while until I'm ready to spend the $ to get the headphones and the amplification.
The HD800 still holds my 'favorite dynamic ever' award. That being said I still stand by what I said before. If you plan to own the TH900 alongside the 009 one day I'd get the best amp you can for the TH900 and run the HD800 off it until you decide to make that plunge. A good solid state/hybrid offering is probably what I'd recommend.
Just my 2 cents of course.
Looks like I'll have to get a different amp to power these guys properly. I currently only have the Schiit Lyr, Schiit Mjolnir, and the Fiio E9.
I am looking at the Violectric V200.
Any one in the US sell that amp or is it only available through their site in Europe?