mkygod
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2010
- Posts
- 101
- Likes
- 23
To get the left earpad off my Fostex TH600, I used to have to pull the earpad itself off first (you can slide it off the plastic mount), then used a thin microfiber cloth and small flathead screwdriver to apply pressure to one of the white nubs. I can usually get it off by hand now, but it's still a pain in the butt. Lawton actually notes how to do it on his website right here.
Please let me know if you hear any sonic differences as I've been considering getting those earcups as well.
I got in the TH-900 cups yesterday from Lawton and put them on today. Fairly straightforward after figuring out how to remove the earpads. Took about 25 mins total. Some photos:
TH-600 before the earcup swap
Innards of the TH-600 and TH-900 earcups compared. The stuffing material they used looked identical.
TH-600 lookin' pretty after the swap
I came in thinking that these earcups would make my headphones look killer (thumbs up here!) and any improvement would be a bonus. Though I did have a slight worry that these could actually make them sound worse. This is a tricky one for me to judge, since I unfortunately don't have a second TH-600 headphone to compare with. I listened to a couple songs before the mod and half an hour later, I listened it to the same songs.
First thing I noticed was the bass had virtually the same great rumble and extension as I remembered. Nothing out of the ordinary for the TH-600. Then the female vocal hit and I felt that the highs were a little more rolled off than i remembered. These headphones, as with other Fostex made phones I've tried so far (namely the Aurvana Live & D2000) were all sibilant monsters to some degree. It is the biggest turn off for most detractors of these phones. The TH600 in particular had it partially tamed it, which i think was its best and most noticeable improvement. These earcups seem to tame it just slightly farther. It also felt like the upper mids are a little more present, maybe as a result. Overall, it just felt like the upper ranges were more smoothly blended together and the shrillness/sparkliness was toned down a shade.
The only reason I could think of is that maybe the wood material that is used in these cups are not as reflective as the stock magnesium ones. In the past, ive considered dynamatting my D2000 to tighten up the bass. I soon decided that it wasn't a good idea since many people reported that the mod increased the sibilance (the last thing i would want). This was presumably because of the foil used in dynamat that could reflect back the higher frequencies. I'm guessing something similar is at play here with the magnesium cups vs the wooden ones. I suspect the actual Lawton cups would provide an even bigger change/improvement as they seem thicker and have bigger cavities.
The big question though is if these are worth it. I would say yeah, if you love the look of them AND you're okay with what amounts to about 1-2% improvement in sound for $150 bucks. I'm almost sure they'll change the sound more than a recable job can, which btw I had paid someone $100 to do for my D2000 w/ no noticeable change in sound.