fewtch
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2003
- Posts
- 9,559
- Likes
- 38
Quote:
I'm having trouble deciding too. I'd really prefer to use 88.2 (much faster resampling, less CPU load because it's a multiple of 44.1 KHz) but keep going back to 96KHz... something about it seems to sound better. 88.2 KHz sounds just as organic (on my card and to my ears anyway), but somehow loses something... it's very subtle. Something like a slightly decreased sense of overall definition at 88.2, and my ability to hear it varies depending on what music is being played. I freely admit to the possibility that I may be imagining it.
Originally posted by pbirkett I just cant decide whether I prefer 88.2 or 96KHz. With 88.2 you seem to get the same perceived detail increase and opening up of the soundstage, but whilst still sounding somewhat digital. 96 seems to sound a little more organic. The beauty of a computer is its easy to switch though ![]() |
I'm having trouble deciding too. I'd really prefer to use 88.2 (much faster resampling, less CPU load because it's a multiple of 44.1 KHz) but keep going back to 96KHz... something about it seems to sound better. 88.2 KHz sounds just as organic (on my card and to my ears anyway), but somehow loses something... it's very subtle. Something like a slightly decreased sense of overall definition at 88.2, and my ability to hear it varies depending on what music is being played. I freely admit to the possibility that I may be imagining it.