Mimouille
Headphoneus Supremus
I love my 3003 and consider it my go-to iem.
So maybe you should buy a 334 so you would have a togo iem on top of your go-to iem.
I love my 3003 and consider it my go-to iem.
Quote:I love my 3003 and consider it my go-to iem.
So maybe you should buy a 334 so you would have a togo iem on top of your go-to iem.
Hi music,
Kindly ask, if you try the parterre with the 000 or 001 cable?
I am juat wondering if it is worth to own 3003 and parterre. Try the 334 but fatigue after a short while.
I love my 3003 and consider it my go-to iem.
music_4321
Are you listening to both the K3003 and Parterre off the V200?
Very, very well, IMO, but vocals are not forward... nor recessed, for that matter.
i personally wouldn't reccomend it for rock or vocals
Hi there lescanadiens,
Have only tried the stock cable (don't know what model it is), exactly the same stock cable that comes with the TG334.
The quick answer is no (bolded text). The longer answer is, of course, it depends. Like you, and as noted already, the 334s were ultimately not for me. The Parterre's tonal balance is very close to that of the K3003s, so in that sense I'm very happy to own both.
I see. I'm still not quite sure about these since I'm coming from IEM's with a forward mid range (EQ-7, RE262 and CK100). I have also tried the UE900 and I liked bit but the vocals was a bit recessed for my taste.
For what it's worth, I've owned the CK100 (not the newer CK100 Pro), an IEM that was a very, very close relative of the UM3X. I've never heard the EQ-7 or RE262, but 3 and 4 years ago I enjoyed the UM3X & CK100 a lot. A couple of days ago, I stated that of all the phones I've heard, the 3 I'd keep would be the K3003, Parterre and 1601SS.
The FAD 1601SS and its sibling / twin, the 1602SS (aka Piano Forte IX) are seriously mid-centric phones. Their sonics are so different, that I very rarely recommend these phones. In fact, these phones are so different-sounding that some think they're absolute rubbish, and I can understand where they're coming from when they say so. BUT, for some strange reason, I personally need to have either the 1601 or 1602 in my life — I'd need to have one 160X IEM and either my HD800, K3003 or Parterre, if I was forced to only choose two phones (chances are I'd choose either the K3003 or Parterre because both are truly portable). Seems I'm not alone regarding this very strange love for, and/or addiction to, the 160Xs, as several other owner have expressed a tremendous attachment to the sonics of these very peculiar phones.
Now, the 160Xs could never be described as good all-rounders (too mid-centric AND with rolled-off treble and bass). The CK100 & UM3X are not as drastic-sounding as the 160Xs, but I'd take the 160Xs any day over the ATHs & Westones as the 160Xs are not just about their unique midrange. I would not describe the other two IEMs as good all-rounders, either, as they're a bit too warm, with a very intimate sound which isn't always very realistic.
The Parterre, like the K3003s, are more balanced, more correct from a FR standpoint. Not only are they both excellent all-rounders, but, unlike the CK100 & UM3X, they really sound high-end, more like excellent open-back headphones. The Parterre and K3003 simply play in a different league.
You may ultimately still prefer the CK100, but I honestly doubt most people would. BUT, as it happens with any phone, we already have one person (tomscy2000) who says they prefer the F111 (perhaps tranhieu, too, [I'm not sure about him, though]). To me, the F111 isn't even close sonically to the Parterres; the F111 is a very nice phone, but it not so infrequently sounded unconvincing and two-dimensional to these ears. The Parterre, I find, mimics much more convincingly what I hear in the real world.
For what it's worth, I've owned the CK100 (not the newer CK100 Pro), an IEM that was a very, very close relative of the UM3X. I've never heard the EQ-7 or RE262, but 3 and 4 years ago I enjoyed the UM3X & CK100 a lot. A couple of days ago, I stated that of all the phones I've heard, the 3 I'd keep would be the K3003, Parterre and 1601SS.
The FAD 1601SS and its sibling / twin, the 1602SS (aka Piano Forte IX) are seriously mid-centric phones. Their sonics are so different, that I very rarely recommend these phones. In fact, these phones are so different-sounding that some think they're absolute rubbish, and I can understand where they're coming from when they say so. BUT, for some strange reason, I personally need to have either the 1601 or 1602 in my life — I'd need to have one 160X IEM and either my HD800, K3003 or Parterre, if I was forced to only choose two phones (chances are I'd choose either the K3003 or Parterre because both are truly portable). Seems I'm not alone regarding this very strange love for, and/or addiction to, the 160Xs, as several other owner have expressed a tremendous attachment to the sonics of these very peculiar phones.
Now, the 160Xs could never be described as good all-rounders (too mid-centric AND with rolled-off treble and bass). The CK100 & UM3X are not as drastic-sounding as the 160Xs, but I'd take the 160Xs any day over the ATHs & Westones as the 160Xs are not just about their unique midrange. I would not describe the other two IEMs as good all-rounders, either, as they're a bit too warm, with a very intimate sound which isn't always very realistic.
The Parterre, like the K3003s, are more balanced, more correct from a FR standpoint. Not only are they both excellent all-rounders, but, unlike the CK100 & UM3X, they really sound high-end, more like excellent open-back headphones. The Parterre and K3003 simply play in a different league.
You may ultimately still prefer the CK100, but I honestly doubt most people would. BUT, as it happens with any phone, we already have one person (tomscy2000) who says they prefer the F111 (perhaps tranhieu, too, [I'm not sure about him, though]). To me, the F111 isn't even close sonically to the Parterres; the F111 is a very nice phone, but it not so infrequently sounded unconvincing and two-dimensional to these ears. The Parterre, I find, mimics much more convincingly what I hear in the real world.
vocals are not as sweet i guess, i listen to a lot of classical as well, so it seems like i prefer instruments instead of vocals. that being said, i listen to rock and accoustics on it from time to time
A couple of days ago, I stated that of all the phones I've heard, the 3 I'd keep would be the K3003, Parterre and 1601SS.
The FAD 1601SS and its sibling / twin, the 1602SS (aka Piano Forte IX) are seriously mid-centric phones. Their sonics are so different, that I very rarely recommend these phones. In fact, these phones are so different-sounding that some think they're absolute rubbish, and I can understand where they're coming from when they say so. BUT, for some strange reason, I personally need to have either the 1601 or 1602 in my life — I'd need to have one 160X IEM and either my HD800, K3003 or Parterre, if I was forced to only choose two phones (chances are I'd choose either the K3003 or Parterre because both are truly portable). Seems I'm not alone regarding this very strange love for, and/or addiction to, the 160Xs, as several other owner have expressed a tremendous attachment to the sonics of these very peculiar phones.
The Parterre, like the K3003s, are more balanced, more correct from a FR standpoint. Not only are they both excellent all-rounders, but, unlike the CK100 & UM3X, they really sound high-end, more like excellent open-back headphones. The Parterre and K3003 simply play in a different league.