Fit Ear Master piece MH 335 DW Studio Reference First Prototype In The World impression and appreciation thread

Aug 20, 2014 at 10:23 AM Post #16 of 37
Tonite i have done The comparison between My New Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR vs UM Miracle

Source : AK 100 Gold Japan Edition.
AK 240
Amps : Mass Ko Bo 395
Ko Jo KM 01 Brass Edition
Iems : Fit Ear MH 335 DW Studio Reference
Unique Melody Miracle
Cable IC Crystal Cable standard diamond

With two Amps Mass Ko Bo 395 and Ko Jo KM 01 SQ different is huge

High :
Fit Rar MH 335 DW SR :
more extended and has much better prounouce , better clarity and very clear high
UM Miracle :
high like congested can not free from the box and not well pronounce

Mid :
Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR :
Very sweet , clear and very goo pronounce and intimate mid
UM Miracle :
Mid so boomy not so clear , look like the bass bloated to the mid

Bass :
Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR :
Very good in detail , very deep bass with very good bass impact and very good in speed
UM Miracle :
Bass sound so boomy and bloated and I hear like subwoofer bass

Separation :
Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR :
Excellent that we can detect individual instrument very accurate
UM Miracle :
Separation is not so good because of boomy bass , I can not so easy detect individual instruments

Soundstage :
Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR
Is 3 D presentation like in big concert hall
UM Miracle
Not so wide compare to Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR

Overall :
Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR has much better presentation in all frequencies , that I can hear more detail and has fuller sound
I did not expected that the SQ is very big between these two custom iems .Fit Ear MH 335 DW more grand presentation than my UM Miracle
And has more micro detail and excellent in clarity .
From the price range is not fair comparison , Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR cost more than double UM Miracle

IMO





 
Aug 20, 2014 at 11:04 AM Post #17 of 37
@rudi
How would you compare the MASS-Kobo 395 vs the Bakoon HDA-5520 for use with FitEars and other sensitive IEMs?


Overall Bakoon HDA 5520 SQ is better than Mass Ko Bo 395 , power wise is overkill for iems

Bakoon HDA 5520 pair with my Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR is excellent , better in detail , gas fuller sound
I must tame down my ak 240 volume to 55 and on Bakoon HDA 5520 only at 7 o clock already laud
The SQ difference is not like David and Goliath , but noticeable
These two have slightly hiss on sensitive iems
 
Aug 27, 2014 at 12:42 PM Post #18 of 37
To Nite i have pair My Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR Prototype With My Bakoon amp HDA 5520

Source : AK 240
Amp : Bakoon HDA 5520
Iem : Fit Ear MH 335 DW Studio Reference Prototype
Cable : IC Crystal Cable Dream. Line With Via Blue mini plug
Ak 240 set : to 55
Bakoon Amp 5520 set : to 8 max 9 o clock
CD album : Carol. Kidd Nice Work 24 Bit / 96 KHz

My impression :

High : very Clear and very clean with rich In detail and very excellent presentation
The best high I ever heard from all iems I ever heard and owned
Mid : very sweet and intimate , very clear and clean mid and natural with excellent prounouce
Like the Sanger live sing infront of me in live concert hall
Bass : very good in detail , very clean and very good bass impact
The bass presentation from all iems I ever heard
Separation : excellent presentation , I can hear individual instrument very good in their position
Between individual instrument are not influence to each other
Soundstage : very wide and very good in depth like on big concert hall
Make overall sound signature so full like from full side headphone
Background : very black background

Overall:

It sound like from full cans headphone , Ii is so full that like I hear in live concert
This is one of the best audiophile set up I ever heard from custom IEM.
The sound signature so natural and so real .
This set up like overkill for iems , that is not overkill, Bakoon HDA 5520 can drive my Fit Ear MH 3335 DW SR
To their maximum potential .
I love the naturalness SQ , the intimate mid and very clean and deep sounding bass
This. MH 335 SR is really master piece from Fit Ear
I can hear for long listening hours never get fatigue

Imo


 
Sep 17, 2014 at 1:50 PM Post #19 of 37
Tonite i have done The comparison between My Two top Tier CIEMs
Fit Ear MH. 335 DW Studio Reference Prototype vs
JH Roxanne In Black Carbon Fiber

Set Up :
Source : iPhone 4 S
DAC / Amp : Cypher Labs Theorem 720
Amp : Tube amp Fostex HP V1
Cable : IC is Crystal Cable Standard Dismond
Moon Audio mini USB to 30 PIN Lod

High :
Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR : very smooth and natural sounding High With A Lot of presents
Jh Roxanne CF : more extended High , it has better clarity , but High a bit peaky

Mid :
Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR : very natural and very intimate sounding mid , No sibilance i have tried With many dax Amps
The Best midrange i Ever heard from all iems
Jh Roxanne CF : mid sound to mid high and has always sibilance in all my set up

Bass :
Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR : better bass detail and cleaner bass with a lot of detail , very deep and very good impact
JH Roxanne CF : very good bass and very good bass detail , bass less deep than mh 335 DW SR

Separation :
Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR : very good separation
JH Roxanne CF : has very good separation too

Soundstage :
fit Ear MH 335 DW SR : has very wide and very good depth like i hear from small home audio speaker
JH Roxanne CF : has very wide and has less depth ,The sound Stage is surround My Head

Overall:
The SQ different between MH 335 DW SR and JH Roxanne CF is not signicant like i have compare to My UM miracle .

The Winner is Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR , sound is Fuller like i hear from small speaker and has better pronounce In all frequencies
I hear excellent balance and the Best midrange i Ever heard , mid very sweet and intimate and No sibilance .

If JH Roxanne is not so sibilance , The different is not Far behind from My Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR
Overall JH Roxanne CF sound is not full , It is not so full sound like My MH,335 DW SR .

IMO


 
Oct 15, 2014 at 8:42 PM Post #20 of 37
@rudi
How would you compare the MASS-Kobo 395 vs the Bakoon HDA-5520 for use with FitEars and other sensitive IEMs?


Sorry for late reply
Baboon HDA 5520 is very good amp and powerful
In null volume control you will hear sound in your iems
I think is to over power for iems

Mass Ko Bo 395 is very good amp and suite better for iems

Sq Bakoon HDA 5520 is slightly better than Mass Ko Bo 395

IMO
 
Oct 15, 2014 at 8:50 PM Post #21 of 37
I would like to share my mini meet yesterday with James from Singapore

He tried my gears as follow :
Amps :
Cypher labs Duet Silver
Bakoon HDA 5520
Wagnus Epsilon S

CIEMs:
JH Roxanne AKR 03
JH Roxanne custom Carbon Fiber
Fit Ear MH 335 DW Studio Reference prototype with stock cable 001

Below I have copied his impression:
Source : AK 100 Gold
Amps : Wagnus Epsilon S
CIEMs : Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR.
Cable : IC Crystal Cable Reference 3 braided
IC Van Den Hul from DITA in black color

James Wunderkind Song very deep poison... if you see on of the photos with my eyes almost closed... the King has administered a very lethal poison... hence my bodily reaction to the poison was exhibiting that facial expression.

but i also told King that the poison is too deep, i may not think straight and run away with his wagnus

jokes aside, the 335 DW SR was indeed a phenomenal experience.

When i first hear the SR with my AK100 (yes, i got the same Gold as the King, because King back then also poison me to get Gold), the first things that is most obvious is the extensive musical layering in the present Sound Signature. and because of the amount of layering presented, it gives me a better perception of details and depth within and between each musical instrument.

the staging was really... i cannot find any words to describe it. All i knew was, i was standing in a dark, but not knowing how far it extends or how near the "stage wall" is. because walls of staging moves back and forth, hence giving you the idea of how the music could be easily presented to you based on the recording of the music.
Imaging... was... okokok, all i can say, i almost fainted. in a very very very very positive way.

the lows were very firm, strong, revealing, and steady. no overwhelming or bleeding into the mid-low or mid range. when i was listen to Erich Kunzel's Round Up album, each timpani hit was very precise... resonance and decay was top notch life-like, i couldnt ask any more of this. this should be the benchmark of lows for me.

the mid range... effortless, but yet firm. not too close to you, but a fair distance. HOWEVER, it is more than good to allow you to hear details in the vocals and breathe. it tries to balance itself between being neutral but natural at the same time. If any one of you heard the C435, it is a slightly more tamed version of C435, in terms of mids. of course.

the highs is the second most obvious to my hearing. it extends really really high but yet doesnt give you the "treble like" sound. and this is a new experience for me. I've never heard anything like that. at the end of each cymbal hit... it doesnt have shrill-like sound or "sudden stoppage" of resonance and/or decay. but it just feels as if it would roll off very smooth and naturally. I wouldnt say the highs are linear, but neither it was an exponential roll off. somehow the tuning of the high range is very very interesting! until now the sound is still in my head... and i am trying to negotiate and understand what is it going on.

All in all, imagine a continuum with Neutral and Natural on each end, the 335DW SR is slightly bias to being neutral... but yet still doesnt lose any emotion in the music or vocals. IT simply just does everything right, precise, and accurate. there is no under or over emphasis. details and microdetails just keeps coming your way with good textured layering and timbre.

imho, if i ever have the money and time (i am an undergraduate), i would invest in this exotic gem... and collect.







James Wunderkind Song the King's poison that was administered to me was very strong. the effects brought my soul to another realm, leaving my body behind... like Seance.

I should have used my soul to grab the Wagnus and 335, go far far away hahahahaaha

Uncle Rudi was asking me, "Is it ok?"

I replied, "Not OK".

Uncle Rudi looked surprised and ask, "Why?"

I said, "If OK, i would not be like this...."

 
Oct 17, 2014 at 3:15 PM Post #22 of 37
Hello Rudi0504,
Those 335 SR appear to be killer IEMs for Classical music. Did you try a balanced amp with your AK240 ? If yes was there an SQ improvement ??
Why don't you drive the 335 from the AK240 balanced out ?
 
Oct 20, 2014 at 4:54 AM Post #23 of 37
Mid :
Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR :
Very sweet , clear and very goo pronounce and intimate mid
UM Miracle :
Mid so boomy not so clear , look like the bass bloated to the mid

Bass :
Fit Ear MH 335 DW SR :
Very good in detail , very deep bass with very good bass impact and very good in speed
UM Miracle :
Bass sound so boomy and bloated and I hear like subwoofer bass



IMO

 
I have had my Miracle for close to 3 years. 
Never once have I felt that the mids or bass is boomy.
 
If anything, I personally feel that the bass for Miracle is incredibly tight, while the mids is very clear.
 
Rudi, may I ask how long have you burn in your set?
 
Oct 20, 2014 at 12:41 PM Post #24 of 37
I have had my Miracle for close to 3 years. 
Never once have I felt that the mids or bass is boomy.

If anything, I personally feel that the bass for Miracle is incredibly tight, while the mids is very clear.

Rudi, may I ask how long have you burn in your set?


Hi Joe-Siow

I have my UM miracle since 2011

This is unfair comparison from the price different , it is almost 3 times for MH 335 DW SR. , as I bought during UM Miracle launching in Indonesia cost about $ 900 USD
 
Oct 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM Post #25 of 37
Hi Joe-Siow

I have my UM miracle since 2011

This is unfair comparison from the price different , it is almost 3 times for MH 335 DW SR. , as I bought during UM Miracle launching in Indonesia cost about $ 900 USD

 
Hi Rudi, I'm not comparing these 2 CIEMs. Rather, I'm commenting on the sound of Miracle, as I do not recall them being boomy. 
 
In any case, I've had the fortune of listening to a MH335DW SR during the last Mooks in Singapore.
It has indeed address certain issues that bothered me, namely the boomy bass and treble roll off.
 
Dec 9, 2014 at 6:28 PM Post #27 of 37
If you use mh334 or mh335dw or to go 334 please help me.
I usually listen to R&B and Hip-Hop, sometimes acoustic songs too.
I'm really confused which one is better for my music. MH334 or MH335DW or to go 334?
money isn't concern, but their sound... Please help me!!
and i heard 334 is shimmer (i dont know why but it sounds good)
I'm just a music listener and nothing like a profession
which sound sweet?(for R&B or anything)
and i don't like roxanne style (too calm and no fun in music)
 
Dec 9, 2014 at 11:18 PM Post #28 of 37
The 334 and 335 do sound different and they are both very good. You may prefer the 335 because of its bass, which would match the sort of music you listen to. The TG334 is a universal so you get it a lot quicker but really, if money isn't a concern, get both! And while you're at it, get the 333 too, it's excellent for vocals. Last word: consider upgrading the cable.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top