Having owned both the K7 and now the K9 I can honestly say the build quality is substantially better on the K9. Noise floor wise they are both about the same no real difference using IEM's that I can hear. Layering wise and instrument placement wise the K9 is a long way in front of the K7, soundstage is also wider on the K9. Bass wise the K9 has more weight and impact to it relative to the K7. Overall the sound presentation of the K7 is smoother than the K9 but the K9 is cleaner. My favourite K9 pairing would be with FiiO's own FD7 which is sublime. Whether it's worth 3 times the price of a K7 that's debatable, for some yes for others no the laws of diminishing returns applies here. You could argue does the K9 Pro justify its price relative to the K9? Bottom line with audio price is not relative to performance.
Thank you for sharing. Lot of insight here, and a lot I agree with. K9's build quality is indeed substantially better - the K7 feels like a cheap toy comparatively, and that alone personally makes the K9 super appealing.
Having spent some more time on all devices (K7, K9, K9 Pro ESS) yeah I think the K9 is great at its price point. Sonically, I agree that layering & instrument placing on the K9 is just a level up from the K7. I will also agree the bass has more authority - I'm not saying there's more bass, but yes what bass it does have is slightly more compelling.
As much as I like the K9, why I'm apprehensive to outright say that the K9 is worth triple the price of the K7 however, is because listening to music on the K9 (with Arya Stealth), it definitely feels like there's a level of fuzz veiling whatever music I'm listening to. I don't get much hiss on IEMs when there's no music playing, but when music is playing there's definitely something tangible and noticeable on my Arya. This is to a similar or perhaps slightly greater extent than the K7, and is a phenomenon I don't experience at all on the K9 Pro ESS.
This is why though I most certainly agree with what you said about diminishing returns, and that price isn't relative to performance, I'm not 120% certain the K9 is worth triple the price of the K7. To be clear I still think the K9 is a great device - if not for this above observation I would've said it's a no-brainer blind buy at its price because the K9 is an upgrade and a triumph in every other way.
The good news is, my experience seems to be a one-off (maybe there's just something up with the one unit I tried), but if this is a replicable phenomenon then of course it would be something to think about when spending this money while we're in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis.