FiiO K7/K7BT Desktop DAC&Headphone AMP Discussion | XLR Balance | Dual THX AAA | Xmos | ...
Nov 10, 2020 at 11:20 AM Post #272 of 1,432
@Kean FiiO
Nice to meet you, Kean.
If you can't use the AKM DAC, then the ESS ES9038Pro*2 implementation would be suitable for you.
Also, although this is not common, I think you could implement CPLD processing before the ES9038Pro to achieve a lower level of distortion.
Thank you.
 
Nov 11, 2020 at 10:36 AM Post #274 of 1,432
@Kean FiiO
Nice to meet you, Kean.
If you can't use the AKM DAC, then the ESS ES9038Pro*2 implementation would be suitable for you.
Also, although this is not common, I think you could implement CPLD processing before the ES9038Pro to achieve a lower level of distortion.
Thank you.
Yes, we will continue the K9 project with ES9038PRO*2,the functions and circuit will be changed also.
We maybe start K9Pro first
 
FiiO Stay updated on FiiO at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/FiiOAUDIO https://twitter.com/FiiO_official https://www.instagram.com/fiioofficial/ https://www.fiio.com support@fiio.com
Nov 11, 2020 at 11:37 PM Post #275 of 1,432
Unfortunately, BB AUDIO DAC chip does not support high sampling rates,such as 384k

Any idea on release dates? I'm really wanting an all in one and would like to get this.
 
Nov 13, 2020 at 6:37 AM Post #279 of 1,432
800+ (K9 Pro) vs 200 (K5 Pro). Wide price range, so enough space for something in the middle.
 
Nov 14, 2020 at 2:39 PM Post #280 of 1,432
Double Sabre Pro chip, my yeah! Must be a killer.
I wonder, as i use optical only, that his dac can upsample internally at least to 96khz, or maybe up to 24bit/192. I just don't see this usual feature, which in my opinion is necessary, basically anywhere :/
 
Nov 14, 2020 at 3:08 PM Post #281 of 1,432
Double Sabre Pro chip, my yeah! Must be a killer.
I wonder, as i use optical only, that his dac can upsample internally at least to 96khz, or maybe up to 24bit/192. I just don't see this usual feature, which in my opinion is necessary, basically anywhere :/
Upsampling is generally a silly feature though. Internally Sabre and AKM DAC oversample to MHz rates (from kHz). Doing a little upsampling before that won't really improve things (except perhaps jitter, which in modern DACs shouldn't ever be an issue anyway).
Upsampling was a big thing years ago with first USB DACs. Nowadays you rarely see it anymore because people know better...
 
Nov 14, 2020 at 5:35 PM Post #282 of 1,432
Too bad they didn't stick with the look from the original post, because it would have looked 1000% better to me.
11197031.png
1600265298300.png
.
 
Nov 14, 2020 at 5:43 PM Post #283 of 1,432
Too bad they didn't stick with the look from the original post, because it would have looked 1000% better to me.11197031.png1600265298300.png.
Seconded
 
Nov 16, 2020 at 7:24 AM Post #284 of 1,432
Thirded... lol
 
Nov 16, 2020 at 4:55 PM Post #285 of 1,432
Upsampling is generally a silly feature though. Internally Sabre and AKM DAC oversample to MHz rates (from kHz). Doing a little upsampling before that won't really improve things (except perhaps jitter, which in modern DACs shouldn't ever be an issue anyway).
Upsampling was a big thing years ago with first USB DACs. Nowadays you rarely see it anymore because people know better...
I guess you're talking about high-sample rate like DSD512 or 712KHZ? Which in optical without upsampling software i couldn't get, so i'm stuck at 44/48khz if i'm not mistaken? With recent dac like Topping E30
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top