Vinny77
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2004
- Posts
- 217
- Likes
- 0
So as a replacement for my Shure E2c's I got the SE210's for a decent price. I have been reading and asking around on these forums and everybody seemed to tell me the SE210's were a great upgrade to the e2c's. While comparing the two I find the SE210's to be inferior when compared to the e2c's. The voices are very clear but the music is incredibly muffled, muddy and bland. I usually just use a iPod nano to test, though I used an iPod 5.5G via line out with a iBasso D2 Boa listening to flac files. I especially used flan vinyls such as Tool.
I am doing a 48 hr burn in right now and will report back, but after the 15 hr burn in, I am quite disappointed. The e2c's are judt a overall better sounding headphone with clearer highs and lows as well as more bass.
I then compared both to the SE530 and they both sound like garbage in comparison, though I cant afford those.
I am doing a 48 hr burn in right now and will report back, but after the 15 hr burn in, I am quite disappointed. The e2c's are judt a overall better sounding headphone with clearer highs and lows as well as more bass.
I then compared both to the SE530 and they both sound like garbage in comparison, though I cant afford those.