d.phens
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2006
- Posts
- 342
- Likes
- 13
Etymotic naming convention for that model is full o' mess...
I can't tell myself in fact which name is correct, so I'm asking YOU for help!
Thank you very much, I hope that many head-fiers would like to shed some light on that white / transparent intraaural darkness...
Etymotic ER6 ? || Etymotic ER6i ? || Etymotic ER6i Isolator ? || Etymotic ER6 -Isolator ? || Etymotic 6i ? || Etymotic 6i Isolator ? || Etymotic ER6 Isolator ?
I call this type of MESS Purple Haze, even my own school notes are more coherent!
Please tell me which name is correct at least
Etymotic uses different conventions for model names stated on specs site and ones PRINTED on the drivers themselves...
As far as I know, there is just ONE difference:
Cable impedance...
"6i" 16 Ohms 108 dB @ 0.1V 50 Hz to 16 kHz
"ER•6" 48 Ohms 97 dB @ 0.1V 20 Hz to 16 kHz
But older 48 Ohm version stating better frequency response for the same tolerance level?
Whatever the names are, we must clarify two things now and for ever:
How many DIFFERENT DRIVERS did etymotic make for those *6* named line of IEMs having the same enclosure shape?
headphone.com's graph database lists only one such model: ER-6
which means that ER-6i was designed a bit later in ER-4P's flavour to make an easier-to-drive IEM version.
Did they use different transducers as well?
Do you think we should ask etymotic staff?
I bet ER-6** sales would improve significantly if they shed some light on the topic...
Well and maybe we should start selling 6i -> 6 adapters as well
I can't tell myself in fact which name is correct, so I'm asking YOU for help!
Thank you very much, I hope that many head-fiers would like to shed some light on that white / transparent intraaural darkness...
Etymotic ER6 ? || Etymotic ER6i ? || Etymotic ER6i Isolator ? || Etymotic ER6 -Isolator ? || Etymotic 6i ? || Etymotic 6i Isolator ? || Etymotic ER6 Isolator ?
I call this type of MESS Purple Haze, even my own school notes are more coherent!
Please tell me which name is correct at least
Etymotic uses different conventions for model names stated on specs site and ones PRINTED on the drivers themselves...
As far as I know, there is just ONE difference:
Cable impedance...
"6i" 16 Ohms 108 dB @ 0.1V 50 Hz to 16 kHz
"ER•6" 48 Ohms 97 dB @ 0.1V 20 Hz to 16 kHz
But older 48 Ohm version stating better frequency response for the same tolerance level?
Whatever the names are, we must clarify two things now and for ever:
How many DIFFERENT DRIVERS did etymotic make for those *6* named line of IEMs having the same enclosure shape?
headphone.com's graph database lists only one such model: ER-6
which means that ER-6i was designed a bit later in ER-4P's flavour to make an easier-to-drive IEM version.
Did they use different transducers as well?
Do you think we should ask etymotic staff?
I bet ER-6** sales would improve significantly if they shed some light on the topic...
Well and maybe we should start selling 6i -> 6 adapters as well