Emmeline "The Shadow"
Aug 20, 2009 at 10:04 AM Post #108 of 999
So close to P-51, both price and sounding. As I prefer to have P-51 at first, how I make the decision?
 
Aug 20, 2009 at 12:00 PM Post #109 of 999
Quote:

Originally Posted by ManAtWork /img/forum/go_quote.gif
So close to P-51, both price and sounding. As I prefer to have P-51 at first, how I make the decision?


That's a difficult matter in your situation.
I have P-51 & have loved it's vigorous, nimble sound with a little warmth & cool design.
According to jamato8's review of The Shadow, without any caps in the signal path, The Shadow has clean, pure sound.
However, P-51 can sound many earbuds or headphones (for example, my Triple.fi 10 Pro, UM3X & Edition8) very attractively too.

I recommend Both.
But, If you want one,
Finally, I think Your choice depends on Your needs.
difference between these 2 amps: design, size, volume type (analogue knob or digital), the existence of caps or without any caps :

Anyway, Ray's amps are so reliable
happy_face1.gif
 
Aug 20, 2009 at 8:49 PM Post #110 of 999
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kura /img/forum/go_quote.gif
That's a difficult matter in your situation.
I have P-51 & have loved it's vigorous, nimble sound with a little warmth & cool design.
According to jamato8's review of The Shadow, without any caps in the signal path, The Shadow has clean, pure sound.
However, P-51 can sound many earbuds or headphones (for example, my Triple.fi 10 Pro, UM3X & Edition8) very attractively too.

I recommend Both.
But, If you want one,
Finally, I think Your choice depends on Your needs.
difference between these 2 amps: design, size, volume type (analogue knob or digital), the existence of caps or without any caps :

Anyway, Ray's amps are so reliable
happy_face1.gif



Non of my portables have caps in the signal path.
Non what so ever.
Ray Samuels
 
Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 AM Post #111 of 999
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray Samuels /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Non of my portables have caps in the signal path.
Non what so ever.
Ray Samuels



Hi Ray,
I understood it.
Sorry for my misunderstanding about the technical thing.
And,
Thank you for your pointing out.
 
Aug 21, 2009 at 2:52 AM Post #112 of 999
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kura /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Hi Ray,
I understood it.
Sorry for my misunderstanding about the technical thing.
And,
Thank you for your pointing out.



No harm done my friend.
Cheers.
Ray Samuels
 
Aug 21, 2009 at 6:57 AM Post #113 of 999
I generally believe in buying a product that is excellent for one purpose, not an all-rounder but does not excel in any (of course there are exceptions).

I am looking for a portable amp to primarily drive my Shure in-ear earphones from iPod touch. Assuming that I will not be using the amp to drive headphones, will the Shadow be the 'ideal' amp for my needs? Am I losing any sound quality by not getting the bigger amp such as the SR-71A? Thanks.
 
Aug 21, 2009 at 7:42 PM Post #114 of 999
Well friends, here are some of the pictures of the first chassis that was sent to me, I have taken some pictures of the Shadow with my other amps to give you the proper prespective of the size of the Shadow in relationship to the other amps that you might own allready.
Enjoy.
Ray Samuels

DSC_5345.jpg


DSC_5344.jpg


DSC_5349.jpg


DSC_5351.jpg


DSC_5352.jpg


DSC_5353.jpg


DSC_5354.jpg


DSC_5355.jpg


DSC_5357.jpg


DSC_5358.jpg


DSC_5359.jpg


DSC_5360.jpg


DSC_5361.jpg


DSC_5362.jpg


DSC_5363.jpg


DSC_5347.jpg
 
Aug 21, 2009 at 9:59 PM Post #117 of 999
Nice, that thing is TINY.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top