ferday
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2012
- Posts
- 1,203
- Likes
- 94
Quote:
i would guess...computers can all decode 24 bit but maybe not higher than 44.1 sample rate, plus a higher sample rate requires more computing power where bit depth does not. not to mention that audibility of higher than 44.1 is extremely suspect (since proper filters are hardly difficult to come by and only the golden few can really hear at 22khz) but since bit depth controls dynamic range, it seems far more likely to be audibly better. and most mastering is already done at 24 bits, but all cd's are 44.1...etc.
it's one of those never ending arguments, and hey i love having 24/96 (even though i've never been able to A/B the difference) but i'll take higher bit depth with lower sampling rate any day over the opposite, if i have to make that choice
for some reason the "24Bit" version of the album is still 44.1khz. whats the point?
i would guess...computers can all decode 24 bit but maybe not higher than 44.1 sample rate, plus a higher sample rate requires more computing power where bit depth does not. not to mention that audibility of higher than 44.1 is extremely suspect (since proper filters are hardly difficult to come by and only the golden few can really hear at 22khz) but since bit depth controls dynamic range, it seems far more likely to be audibly better. and most mastering is already done at 24 bits, but all cd's are 44.1...etc.
it's one of those never ending arguments, and hey i love having 24/96 (even though i've never been able to A/B the difference) but i'll take higher bit depth with lower sampling rate any day over the opposite, if i have to make that choice