So what's your review of the 6N27P?
Well, I have only had a couple of weeks with them, the first few days of which were mostly letting them wake up from their extended slumber, so my impressions are still pretty preliminary. So far, I like them a lot. They have a very clean, detailed and extended sound. The highs are crisp, the bass is deep, tight and very much in control. The mids are smooth and full, but leaning away from lush.
I like the sound a lot with the HF-2, as I expected after your comments. The HD650 surprised me a bit. I really like what they did with these phones, particularly the low end which really focused up more than I expected. A very nice sound. With the LCD2, things get a bit different. The LCD2 sound is still new to me, so, I really should not be rolling tubes through it right now, but, life is short.
I am somewhat on the fence with these on the LCD2. I love the low end control and high end extension, but, the Telefunkens really bring out the lush creamy mids the LCD2 is capable of reproducing. The trade-off then becomes a bit less extension and slightly looser bass. The Tele's also have the edge in soundstage and presence as well.
So, at this point in time, I really like the 6N27P. Price and availability is also a big plus. In the end, I suspect the mu (amplification factor) of the 6N27P is higher than the Telefunken, which results in higher OL gain and a corresponding higher NFB. Back during my CL/OL/NFB experiments, I was able to take an individual set of tubes through a similar set of sound profiles by manipulating the NFB. I wonder if the NFB was brought down on the 6N27P by a few db and up on the Telefunkens by a few db, how close they would start to become. I suspect the Tele would still retain a more refined sound with the 6N27P being the more analytical of the two, but, it might be an interesting experiment.