Earbud target curve tests
Nov 13, 2020 at 10:28 AM Post #77 of 318
Thank you Sam, appreciate it.
You're welcome! The impact isn't as dramatic compared to some other earbuds, mostly due to the fact that the stock tuning is mostly "right" between 100 to 1k (only around 1 to 1.5dB deviation). Soundstage improves some, particularly in width and instrument placement is noticeably improved.
 
Nov 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM Post #78 of 318
Will be giving the monk lite bass edition a shot. Thanks!
 
Nov 13, 2020 at 11:07 AM Post #79 of 318
Thank you Sam, appreciate it.
I'm actually not very confident that the PEQ file through peace apo is working correctly or accurately. I've noticed for some time that the peq settings through peace do not sound the same as the results utilizing wavelet or peq on my qudelix 5k. It didn't bother me before because I do nearly all my listening through my sony a105 or qudelix 5k and btk3 connected to my phone. So wavelet is used exclusively.

However, I'm getting more and more requests for PEQ settings. I will continue to post them but be aware that for windows users I'm getting significantly different FR results between the PEQ implementation in peace/apo and the qudelix 5k, with the qudelix matching more closely with the SQ that results from wavelet.

For any users using the PEQ files through peace/apo, be aware that the results may not be indicative of how my files are intended to be implemented through wavelet.
 
Last edited:
Nov 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Post #80 of 318
I'm actually not very confident that the PEQ file through peace apo is working correctly. I'm getting significantly different FR results between the PEQ implementation in peace/apo and the qudelix 5k, with the qudelix matching more closely with the SQ that results from wavelet.

For any users using the PEQ files through peace/apo, be aware that the results may not be indicative of how my files are intended to be implemented through wavelet.
 
Nov 13, 2020 at 11:15 AM Post #81 of 318
Nov 13, 2020 at 11:43 AM Post #82 of 318
Nov 13, 2020 at 2:08 PM Post #83 of 318
v1.5 Bass Edition for the K's Nameless

Sadly, my Nameless was stolen, so I can't test this out. I'd suggest starting the wavelet file at 50% strength.
just gave this a shot. there's a discernible increase in sub-bass rumble compared to 1.4, a welcome change for bass-heavy tracks. everything else sounds great. i can't really tell the difference in mids and highs between the two versions, but will likely switch between the two depending on the genre playing. mucho gracias!
 
Nov 13, 2020 at 2:11 PM Post #84 of 318
just gave this a shot. there's a discernible increase in sub-bass rumble compared to 1.4, a welcome change for bass-heavy tracks. everything else sounds great. i can't really tell the difference in mids and highs between the two versions, but will likely switch between the two depending on the genre playing. mucho gracias!
Perfect! More or less what I was going for. thank you
 
Nov 17, 2020 at 7:50 AM Post #87 of 318
I know that but i don't have the autoeq option Screenshot_20201117-145518_Wavelet.jpg
 
Nov 17, 2020 at 8:53 AM Post #88 of 318
Last edited:
Nov 17, 2020 at 8:56 AM Post #89 of 318
I know that but i don't have the autoeq optionScreenshot_20201117-145518_Wavelet.jpg
by the way, the autoeq feature often won't show unless you have a music app playing. if you are playing music and it still doesn't show, then select "legacy mode". You can refer to my screenshot above.
 
Nov 17, 2020 at 8:57 AM Post #90 of 318
@jeejack, if you could, let me know what phone and earbuds you are using. I'm keeping track of what people are using.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top