wallijonn
Throwin' tantra.
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2002
- Posts
- 7,242
- Likes
- 15
I'm presently doing comparisons of the two and while EAC takes a long time to convert, CDEx is much faster. As to quality, the DEX hq=0 seemingly makes a larger file and has a jitter guage. They both use the same LAME software. They can both set compression threshold levels. So I have to wonder if EAC is truly better than CDEX.
I've even updated LAME to 3.95 to see if there is a discernible difference; DEX is using 3.90. I upgraded to 3.95 as I could not detect a difference.
Has anyone else done any side by side comparisons?
edit:
Yes, I meant CDEx.
I've even updated LAME to 3.95 to see if there is a discernible difference; DEX is using 3.90. I upgraded to 3.95 as I could not detect a difference.
Has anyone else done any side by side comparisons?
edit:
Yes, I meant CDEx.