E3C worth the extra $$ over E2s?
post-796859
Thread Starter
Post #1 of 33

modestninja

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Posts
38
Likes
0
I've been looking to get some canal phones for when noice cancelling is needed and can't really afford to be spending more than $150 (and even that is stretching my budget as a student). I considered the etys in the price range, but I'd trade some analyticity for a stronger low-end. Anyway, for the most part I listen to indie music (or whatever you call bands like modest mouse), punk, ska, some hip-hop and rap as well as some folk. So having a decent low end is worth more to me than very analytic highs.

To you guys are the E3c worth the extra $50 you have to spend to get them? What does the extra $50 bring? Thanks.
 
     Share This Post       
post-796872
Post #2 of 33

Bolt San

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
959
Reaction score
10
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Posts
959
Likes
10
I have no clue, but modest mouse rocks.
 
     Share This Post       
post-796907
Post #3 of 33

lifeinabox

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
199
Reaction score
57
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Posts
199
Likes
57
I think you should stick with the E2s, especially if bass is important to you and given your musical tastes. From what I understand, the E3s sacrifice a prominent low-end for the midrange. I have the E2s and find them perfectly acceptable for listening to "indie rock."

A general comment about upgrading headphones, if you likie stuff like Modest Mouse, Built to Spill, etc... especially their older stuff, going for more expensive and presumably more revealing headphone might be counter-productive. It will only show you the flaws in the recordings.

BTW, saw Modest Mouse live last month. They certainly do rock in person!
 
     Share This Post       
post-796911
Post #4 of 33

Thaddy

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jan 26, 2004
Messages
4,995
Reaction score
180
Location
Texas
Joined
Jan 26, 2004
Location
Texas
Posts
4,995
Likes
180
I agree with the consensus, stick with your E2's. I was gonna make the upgrade to the E3's, but I would miss the lower frequencies too much. I'd only upgrade to the ER-4's or E5's, which cost considerably more.
 
     Share This Post       
post-796928
Post #5 of 33

modestninja

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Posts
38
Likes
0
Well I wouldn't say that bass is really important to me in my music, it's just that I like having some bass and from what I've read the stys in this price range ER-6 have little bass but excellent highs.

Out of curiosity, which of these two phones has more of the Grado sound. I really like my MS1s and would use them for everything if they weren't such a b*tch to carry around and provided some noise cancelling...
 
     Share This Post       
post-797075
Post #6 of 33

toaster

Previously known as toaster22
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
2,095
Reaction score
1,088
Location
nyc
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Location
nyc
Posts
2,095
Likes
1,088
the e3's have major issues with presenting the lowend frequency spectrum.

i am gonna say it again. the er-4s have more pleasing bass response than the e3's. this means they have more bass audible to lower ranges, and more visceral impact overall. it's true.
 
     Share This Post       
post-797077
Post #7 of 33

toaster

Previously known as toaster22
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
2,095
Reaction score
1,088
Location
nyc
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Location
nyc
Posts
2,095
Likes
1,088
new record - 7 post.
 
     Share This Post       
post-797076
Post #8 of 33

toaster

Previously known as toaster22
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
2,095
Reaction score
1,088
Location
nyc
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Location
nyc
Posts
2,095
Likes
1,088
new record - 7 post.
 
     Share This Post       
post-797079
Post #9 of 33

toaster

Previously known as toaster22
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
2,095
Reaction score
1,088
Location
nyc
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Location
nyc
Posts
2,095
Likes
1,088
new record - 7 post.
 
     Share This Post       
post-797080
Post #10 of 33

toaster

Previously known as toaster22
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
2,095
Reaction score
1,088
Location
nyc
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Location
nyc
Posts
2,095
Likes
1,088
new record - 7 post.
 
     Share This Post       
post-797078
Post #11 of 33

toaster

Previously known as toaster22
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
2,095
Reaction score
1,088
Location
nyc
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Location
nyc
Posts
2,095
Likes
1,088
new record - 7 post.
 
     Share This Post       
post-797082
Post #12 of 33

toaster

Previously known as toaster22
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
2,095
Reaction score
1,088
Location
nyc
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Location
nyc
Posts
2,095
Likes
1,088
wow, what...just...happened...
 
     Share This Post       
post-797148
Post #13 of 33

wolfen68

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 4, 2003
Messages
3,672
Reaction score
110
Joined
Jun 4, 2003
Posts
3,672
Likes
110
I went from E2's to E3's and I felt the E3's were worth it. Less bass (but better), better details and better highs. The E2's aren't bad...the E3's just give me a sense of the "veil being lifted"....and I enjoy listening to them more.
 
     Share This Post       
post-797162
Post #14 of 33

TenaciousO

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 24, 2004
Messages
1,207
Reaction score
11
Joined
Apr 24, 2004
Posts
1,207
Likes
11
When I had the E3s, I also thought they were worth the extra money over the E2s. I sold my pair to move onto some full-sized headphones, but I'm now going back...reordered a pair of E3s a couple of days ago and cannot wait to receive them.
 
     Share This Post       
post-797444
Post #15 of 33

Paris

New Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 25, 2004
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Joined
Mar 25, 2004
Posts
21
Likes
0
i love my E2s ......

Looks-wise


well call me weird but i do prefer the look of the E2s to the E3s. As i could no find a place to test out the phones before purchase, i got to base a small percentage on looks and to add i wanted the phone cable to go behind my back as as to give me bigger ease of use


IMHO, E3s may give off the impression that you are trying to imitate the stage performers behind the ear stage monitors look with normal ear phones. I mean, be honest, how many non-serious "headphiles" will know that we are using a Shure ? Their first thought will most likely be that "hey he's trying to look cool but acting cool aint cool man"

At least the e2s look as if they are meant to go behind the ear an dwould not give out such impressions.

Sound

hmm.... well i listen to a lot of jazz and pop.

i can basically feel the base notes on the jazz recordings . it feels exactly like how i feel when i am in a jazz lounge. i can feel the vibration ( for lack of a more appropriate word) of the base note hitting me.

consider me a very satisfied customer of E2
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top