KevC
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2003
- Posts
- 367
- Likes
- 0
My dad has a 512MB shuffle and I ripped classical music at 96kbps to get more albums on the little thing. I'm thinking of getting E2Cs for him, is it too much?
Originally Posted by titaniumx3 I would have gone slighlty higher, at 128kbps AAC. Never heard AAC, but if its anything like OGG or WMA, it should sound fairly decent at 128kbps, even with the Shure E2c. |
Originally Posted by KevC My dad has a 512MB shuffle and I ripped classical music at 96kbps to get more albums on the little thing. I'm thinking of getting E2Cs for him, is it too much? |
Originally Posted by Anjay Not to change the subject too much, but how does AAC compare to MP3? I assumed it was a lower quality since it was so much smaller.. Enlighten me please |
Originally Posted by chrisfromalbany Generally AAC is alittle less then double the compression of LAME Mp3. 96 AAC = close to 192 LAME MP3 |
Originally Posted by chrisfromalbany Generally AAC is alittle less then double the compression of LAME Mp3. 96 AAC = close to 192 LAME MP3 |
Originally Posted by Ploop shuffle and 96kbps? I don't think any headphones can fix that..... |
Originally Posted by jagorev The shuffle has some of the best sound quality of any DAP. Please don't spread nonsense. |