You gonna regret.
Maybe you got one of the rare duds that are out in the wild that are lifeless. In this topic there are comparisons of 2 that sounded different than each other
Or just different ears
Regret is reserved for something you loved, lost, and can't get back. The X9000 will be available if and when I want to own one again. The timing of the sale had a lot to do with my current need to raise capital, coupled with a motivated buyer. I'm pretty sure my unit wasn't a "dud", as I'd heard a X9000 initially at CanJam NYC, and then borrowed
@number1sixerfan 's. And just to be clear, it's a fantastic headphone in many respects. I still think its sweet spot is classical (true for many estats, IMO), but that's very much an occasional genre for me.
Great write-up. Good that it was such a clear decision, too!
I’m hoping I don’t end up in the same spot (since I sold my Susvara), but I don’t doubt for a moment that the Susvara will do some things better than the X9000. I’m hoping my other headphones (Phi TC, Empy, XC — all through a CFA3) help in those cases.
Thanks, glad you enjoyed it. Looks like you're pretty well covered for rock with the Phi TC (and others). As noted above, the Susvara will be available if and when you decide you need one again.
Rofl. People are so defensive here. I agree with the impressions. Imo, basicaly all estats have a tendency twoarda lack of presence that make the chain so so much more important and difficult to realy nail down. There isn't anything wrong with going "I've got an amazing chain that makes sus make me rap my foot. I have no desire in struggling to see if I can do the same for a can that doesn't do that"
Agree with these sentiments, but FWIW, the SGL Jr. does not lack presence at all to my ears. It's even a little more "in your face" than the Susvara, but as I've opined many times, its flaw is early bass roll-off (and a
slightly hot treble). Nonetheless, the SGL Jr. still gets head time, especially for jazz. A propos that, I often like to stream WRTI Philadelphia, one of the truly great radio stations of any genre, IMHO.
I talked about this a bit in the x9000 thread - but with different tracks.
The x9000 has less volume change between quiet and loud passages, even in comparison to other estats (especially the sr-omega). This does not work well with older recordings, even remastered ones. The who's Bab o'riley is unlistenable for me on the x9000.
However, on newer mastered recordings, where the volume is already intentionally adjusted for dynamics (basically anything newly produced after 2000), the X9000's technical advantages make it an unbeatable headphone imo. The observation is basically that the x9000 is not so much genre sensitive as it is time-period sensitive lol.
Generally agree about estat dynamics, although as I noted at the start of this thread, the SGL seemed to fare better in that department, notably with large scale symphonic works. I also agree that the X9000 was superb overall with electronica, which genre definitely benefits from the X9000's elite staging. Interesting observation about Baba O'Reily. A lot of rock of that era suffered from tape compression and/or lowered bass levels to accommodate LPs. Anecdotally, when the Roxy Music catalog was released on SACD many years ago, I had very high hopes that remastering would yield sonic glory never realized on vinyl... but it wasn't to be. The limitations of the master tapes were still very much in evidence. When someone mentioned Roxy's tour on the Susvara thread a few months ago, I re-listened to several of the early Roxy albums on SACD on the X9000, and must say they sounded better than I'd ever heard them, likely due to the extra bit of clarity in the midrange.
Agree, we should be able to accept that everything isn't everyone's cup of tea and even though we may love something, there are always imperfections with it. Similar to Chefguru, I also shared similar thoughts in the x9000's thread about its "softness". We're all describing it a bit different, but it points to similar and consistent themes, which is ok.
For me, the x9000 could never be my ONLY driver for these reasons, but it's technically amazing and I enjoy the presentation at times as a complement to the others that I prefer as more of a standard.
You've been very clear about this certain laid-back quality of the X9000 from the beginning. I noticed it when I first auditioned it at CanJam NYC also. It's not the ideal headphone for listeners who prefer to sit close to the stage, which I very much do. Also agree that the X9000 is a complementary headphone, and I couldn't justify keeping it around in that role for $6k.
I also echo with the softness, which is shakingly apparent when ab with Shangrila SR in many systems. Yet I found using marbles-based isolation system in conjunction with silver coated PC on T2 with dynamic sounding Russian tubes could effectively and foundationally address that.
As the building and isolation material employed by the HE-1 amplifier, marble does not just to make it look pretty but also comes with underlying sonic reasonings and benefits.
I haven't been able to make a logical connection between isolation bases and audible improvements with
headphones, but like I've said elsewhere: if something improves
your listening experience, go for it. Just to be clear, I own an HRS rack, and still think it was a
great investment for 2-channel listening despite the high price.
Yep — agree also. And from what I've heard so far, the Susvara would be the one for me. When I sold my Susvaras I wrote:
I need to put my head inside a Shangri-La next. Even with that, though — I expect to love it! — I'm not sure it IS possible for me to have one pair of headphones. There are times that the best thing on my bonce is the Empyreans. And I already know that they sound nothing like any of my other gear.
For me, headphones is an AND thing, not an OR thing. (Not the case with speakers, but that's for pretty obvious physical reasons.)
Yes, courtesy of
@number1sixerfan , I will have the opportunity to listen to the SGL again for a few days before his impending move to Chitown. I definitely do want to own an estat (preferably just one), but a potential $12-14k purchase needs to be vetted thoroughly in my world. I would also like to hear the Warwick offerings before I make a final decision. That may happen at CanJam NYC (if I go, and if
they go), but there's no rush to sort it out due to my current financial situation, anyway.
Philosophically, I understand the multiple headphone concept, as they all involve compromises to a higher degree than do speakers. OTOH, I would prefer any headphone I use to be able to handle every genre to a certain (fairly high) standard. I'm something of a minimalist at heart, and too much equipment can be a distraction from just enjoying music. Same with EQ fiddling,
for me. As we know, there are many roads to Rome, so I guess we should all enjoy the scenery from whichever one we're taking (tortured metaphor alert!
).
-----------
Probably a good place to end this for now. There was a lot of activity in this thread yesterday, so I'll try to reply to some other messages later.