bcaulf17
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2016
- Posts
- 1,285
- Likes
- 750
I believe they’re the TH-X00 pads, or at least a clone of themwhat pads do these come with? The th-x00 ones or th-610 ones?
I believe they’re the TH-X00 pads, or at least a clone of themwhat pads do these come with? The th-x00 ones or th-610 ones?
To follow up regarding my experiment with Aliexpress pads in addition to the ZMF Eikon with the attenuator, This pads https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000520417437.html?spm=a2g0s.9042311.0.0.2e8e4c4dVLUQqZ are identical to the original teak pads, and they even come with a plastic attenuation ring sewen inside them. They suffer from the same small ear opening issue, they are just identical in every aspect to the original ones.
The second one https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000090876956.html?spm=a2g0s.9042311.0.0.2e8e4c4dVLUQqZ is surprisingly very good. They are even comfier than the Eikon pads while costing a fraction of the price. They sounded better without the attenuation rings than with them which is a plus. The sound changes were just a tad less bass but better airiness, sound stage and the imaging improved several folds compared to the others. For 18 dollars, in my opinion, those are the best replacement for the Teak pads and since I have installed them the Eikon pads have retired to a dark drawer in my closet. As for everything sound-related, this is my personal opinion and everybody's experience may vary.
How do the emu teaks sound compared to th-610 and the d5200? If i wasn't too impressed by either, will I like the teaks?
How do the emu teaks sound compared to th-610 and the d5200? If i wasn't too impressed by either, will I like the teaks?
How do the emu teaks sound compared to th-610 and the d5200? If i wasn't too impressed by either, will I like the teaks?
Yes i own the d5200 honestly it just sounds a bit boring to me and I agree with you, the highs are a bit too much for me. It also did not have enough bass for me, not enough oomph from the sub bass I think.I had D5200 and E-MU teak at same time. D5200 sounds more resolving with very tight bass, but way too much highs. E-MU has less forward highs (still too much), and the bass is a little uncontrolled. I preferred E-MU’s compromises, and I MUCH preferred it’s headband. The D5200 was a tiny bit too small and uncomfortable. I have a big misshapened head tho. The E-MU is pretty bare internally and could improve with mods. D5200 was already lightly damped and tweaked from factory like TH-X00, so mod improvements may have less potential. Both headphones improved with aftermarket pads: however D5200 still too bright, E-MU bass no longer flabby but still a little bright for me but its okay for my typical low volume listening. I sold D5200. I’m working on some internal resonance/reflection mods for E-MU.
Tyll at Innerfidelity did a big Foster comparison and also preferred E-MU teak.:
https://www.stereophile.com/content...ening-tests-denon-ah-d5000-massdrop-fostex-th
The new Denon series (D5200) no longer use biocellulose drivers. Not sure if thats important to sound but its a cool factor in favor of E-MU.
Not sure about those, but I am returning the TH900 Mk2 and keeping the Teak. TH900 is way too bright and thin for my taste, lacks body. Needs serious EQing otherwise the highs will shred your ears. Lower mids too recessed as well.
The Teak is nicely balanced. Doesn’t quite have the resolving power of the TH900, but I don’t want them to be hyper analytical anyway.
I’ve have all three.How do the emu teaks sound compared to th-610 and the d5200? If i wasn't too impressed by either, will I like the teaks?