Mango os is cool and all but it lags like hell and its very annoying! Is it suppose to be laggy or is there a problem with my device? First time owning an ibasso player
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
DX240 DAP. DAC ES9038PRO - NEW: AMP8MK2S .****** NEW Firmware! 2.01 *******
- Thread starter Paul - iBasso
- Start date
jamato8
Headphoneus Supremus
How is it laggy? I would do a factory reset.Mango os is cool and all but it lags like hell and its very annoying! Is it suppose to be laggy or is there a problem with my device? First time owning an ibasso player
Like every time i wanna skip a track it takes like 1 or 2 seconds before it skips it. And same thing happens when i wanna FF a track. It takes a second...nothing is instant like in Android
14christ
Headphoneus Supremus
I don't know if lag is the correct word as much as lacking fluidity and that usually comes down to a lacking in the optimization of the code. Compared to something like Tidal that basically has an unlimited budget for developers, the Mango OS more than likely focused on sound quality and I think it shows in the players UI. The sound quality is brilliant but I do agree it does seem to be a bit troublesome from time to time.Mango os is cool and all but it lags like hell and its very annoying! Is it suppose to be laggy or is there a problem with my device? First time owning an ibasso player
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
- Posts
- 15,519
- Likes
- 49,612
Like every time i wanna skip a track it takes like 1 or 2 seconds before it skips it. And same thing happens when i wanna FF a track. It takes a second...nothing is instant like in Android
When you switch to Mango OS, scan your tracks again (just do it the first time). The file indexing under Android is different from Unix/Mango OS and you have to re-scan tracks again to index them in Mango OS. If you don't, it will be lagging when you skip tracks or even affect when fast forwarding through a track.
Ok thanks will do that
ReizeiMako
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
- Posts
- 293
- Likes
- 41
After trying many music players for DX240 personally I think Shanling Music is the best. Smoother sound than Mango to my ears and also has better functions.
Hiby make a weird sound when you pause music, also sometimes sluggish.
UAPP still not show correct sample rate. Not sure if it able to access direct dac and play bit perfect with 24/96 and above.
Hiby make a weird sound when you pause music, also sometimes sluggish.
UAPP still not show correct sample rate. Not sure if it able to access direct dac and play bit perfect with 24/96 and above.
arch7tect
New Head-Fier
ibasso daps has system wide "non-src" feature. dx240 bypasses SRC (sample rate conversion) whether it is build-in Mango player or using 3-party apps.UAPP still not show correct sample rate. Not sure if it able to access direct dac and play bit perfect with 24/96 and above.
https://www.ibasso.com/product/dx240/
as for the bit perfect. If you play an MQA file in UAPP (android driver/variable bitrate), you can see 768kHz in the status bar. However, if you change the volume in UAPP, you will immediately see 44kHz in the status bar. Because the change to the stream caused the MQA signature to break. So it's definitely bit perfect.
Last edited:
ReizeiMako
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
- Posts
- 293
- Likes
- 41
Thank for insight! This is my first time with UAPP so some of configurable confuse me.ibasso daps has system wide "non-src" feature. dx240 bypasses SRC (sample rate conversion) whether it is build-in Mango player or using 3-party apps.
https://www.ibasso.com/product/dx240/
as for the bit perfect. If you play an MQA file in UAPP (android driver/variable bitrate), you can see 768kHz in the status bar. However, if you change the volume in UAPP, you will immediately see 44kHz in the status bar. Because the change to the stream caused the MQA signature to break. So it's definitely bit perfect.
ReizeiMako
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
- Posts
- 293
- Likes
- 41
Anyone ever pair Softears RSV and Tanchjim New Hana with 240? What is your impression? I just order RSV and should get a pair of Hana soon.
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
- Posts
- 15,519
- Likes
- 49,612
Anyone ever pair Softears RSV and Tanchjim New Hana with 240? What is your impression? I just order RSV and should get a pair of Hana soon.
Ani covered it in his DX240 review, scroll down to IEM pair up section to read RSV and RS10 pair up comments.
Animagus
Reviewer at Twister6
Hey! What @twister6 said. For Tanchjim New Hana 2021, my impressions of Kato pairing apply almost perfectly to it.Anyone ever pair Softears RSV and Tanchjim New Hana with 240? What is your impression? I just order RSV and should get a pair of Hana soon.
Amp8 MKII arrived today. Pre burn-in impressions are that I am missing low end impact and that got me slightly worried because I thought it was supposed to have the opposite effect. I'll definitely give it the 100 hours and hope for the best.
BobJS
Headphoneus Supremus
Amp8 MKII arrived today. Pre burn-in impressions are that I am missing low end impact and that got me slightly worried because I thought it was supposed to have the opposite effect. I'll definitely give it the 100 hours and hope for the best.
I do not like to hear this. Mine arrives tomorrow. I had hoped to keep the new Amp8mkII so I could return the Amp8ex to my dx220 and keep them both in use.
Last edited:
jamato8
Headphoneus Supremus
It needs 100 to 200 hours of burn in. The bass develops just fine. Caps and circuitry in general need to have current flowing through them so things settle and burn in. This is normal.Amp8 MKII arrived today. Pre burn-in impressions are that I am missing low end impact and that got me slightly worried because I thought it was supposed to have the opposite effect. I'll definitely give it the 100 hours and hope for the best.
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 13 (members: 0, guests: 13)