proedros
Headphoneus Supremus
I cannot do a direct comparison to the DN-2000 at this moment in time because I don't have one. I can only state that, in my years of listening to all matter of IEMs, along with a direct comparison to the UERM, is that the DN-2000J is very, very good. Once I get the chance, I will compare the DN-2000J directly with the DN-2000, as well as the K3003 (reference filters).
A few notes on the sound, to address peoples' concerns:
- .
- Is there sibilance? Yes, but not much. It's more a bit of harshness, so that bit sits beyond the typical range of sibilance. Even so, I think it's controlled enough such that it crops up only now and then. Contrast this with the K3003, which is constantly teetering on the brink of sibilance (but strategically pulls back on the damage).
- I have not heard any T-PEOS product, so I cannot comment on them. I really have not been a fan of hybrids --- if people look at my posts, I generally do not have good things to say about the Astrotec hybrids, and even didn't exactly find the K3003 ultra-worthy (though I have grown to respect it greatly as a groundbreaker in multiple areas). Thus, I've really been more of an anti-hybrid evangelist, and have only found the Sony XBA-A3/Z5, as well as the current crop of DUNU hybrids (1000/2000) to be acceptable in overall performance and value.
since i disagree with both bold posts , i guess i will not really care what your thoughts are on the K3/dunu comparison
no offense , but i think you will probably upvote the dune/downvote the K3 more than they're worth
no offense though , i guess dunu will be a good copycat for those not wanting/being able to get the real thing (K3 that is)
me , i am 100% happy with my K3 , and i laugh at all the bad hype this iem had the previous years (then again , hype - good or bad - is a very usual thing in here)
cheers