Ozric
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2002
- Posts
- 570
- Likes
- 10
It's a reflection of the tragic history of rock 'n' roll that only two on that list died of natural causes: Zappa and Cash.
Originally Posted by Ozric /img/forum/go_quote.gif It's a reflection of the tragic history of rock 'n' roll that only two on that list died of natural causes: Zappa and Cash. |
Originally Posted by DavidMahler /img/forum/go_quote.gif ...people that are killed in cold blood clearly deserve a second chance at life more than those who overdose or commit suicide. |
Originally Posted by jonathanjong /img/forum/go_quote.gif "I wonder if they have discussions on when we will eventually join them again." Huh? Like, whether they try to predict our deaths? |
Originally Posted by scompton /img/forum/go_quote.gif I don't know how every one on the list died, but at least one other died of natural causes. Bob Marley died of cancer. I know that a couple at least died in accidents. |
Originally Posted by DrBenway /img/forum/go_quote.gif This is monumentally silly, on its face. |
Originally Posted by jonathanjong /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'll second that. It's not that the ODers and suiciders don't deserve another shot, but I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest that they died more on their own terms than did people like Lennon (and Gandhi and King Jr. and Jesus and Socrates). So, if the choice is between the former group and the latter then, ceteris paribus, I'd bring the latter back. |
Originally Posted by MoonShine /img/forum/go_quote.gif How so? Led Zeppelin has an astonishingly large and loyal fan base. |
Originally Posted by yoginasser /img/forum/go_quote.gif I miss Eva Cassidy. |
Originally Posted by hollabackitsobi /img/forum/go_quote.gif so ultimately they're more of a victim of external factors from their environment and internal factors (genetics) that are both beyond their (or anyone's) control than a proximate cause of their own deaths. Just food for thought. |