kyotousa
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2005
- Posts
- 256
- Likes
- 49
Why would people even consider this over Deva lol
So you have 4XX for $130, Deva $220, Sundara $350.
So you have 4XX for $130, Deva $220, Sundara $350.
Last edited:
Possibly because the Deva looks like poopWhy would people even consider this over Deva lol
Dang choose the color scheme over better headband lolPossibly because the Deva looks like poop
I thought it was repeatedly established that this driver is not performing the same as the Deva wired... why are we going back over this?
It has similar parts, but it is not the same execution.
If you consider all the evidence, it's undeniable the driver is the Deva driver. We are merely pointing out that it containing same driver as Deva is conclusive and not what some thought to be speculatory in the past.I thought it was repeatedly established that this driver is not performing the same as the Deva wired... why are we going back over this?
It has similar parts, but it is not the same execution.
If you just want a decent planar then they are a good option. Most complaints are because they are not HE500 based, and that they are black Devas. If you don’t care about that then they are ok.I just ordered the 5XX a few days ago, back on November 11th.. supposed to be shipped out this week on the 18th. This will be first planar magnetic headphones. I've been doing a lot of reading and watching reviews on the 5XX, and it's definitely a mixed bag of reviews. Not going to lie, I'm kind of having mixed feeling about the purchase even though I have not received them yet. At the same time, I am really looking forward to being able to experience planars.. Maybe the 5XX will not be the ideal experience? Probably not.. But anyway, I'll I guess I find out soon enough. Sundara will be following the 5XX soon.
Been following all the drama surrounding the 5XX and the Deva, as well. Has anyone checked this comparison out between the 5XX and the Deva drivers?
https://www.superbestaudiofriends.o...a-and-the-assumptions-behind-the-he5xx.10106/
Interesting findings.
If you just want a decent planar then they are a good option. Most complaints are because they are not HE500 based, and that they are black Devas. If you don’t care about that then they are ok.
Hard to draw conclusions when the measuring rig for the "HE5XX driver != Deva driver" assertion is a cobbled-together flat-plate coupler. Here's an example of one below:Interesting findings.. if accurate.
Yeah, there's yall's answer to where that 8k peak comes from.Hard to draw conclusions when the measuring rig for the "HE5XX driver != Deva driver" assertion is a cobbled-together flat-plate coupler. Here's an example of one below:
I'm not saying that they're all bad, but it probably isn't the right tool to make such conclusions especially against a well-calibrated GRAS measurement rig (the one used by Resolve, crin, oratory1990, others), an industry standard.
That’s why people apply compensation curves to the RAW measurements. That’s also applied in the fancy-ass GRAS systems.Yeah, there's yall's answer to where that 8k peak comes from.
That's a funny rig, I wonder if that face drawn to make it more like a human head. XD
See, unreliable rigs will put out peaks in random frequencies due to the characteristics of the rig, and it causes false impressions if one tries to read the response based on those measurements. One cannot reliably base what they hear based on those rigs. One shouldn't base what they HEAR from measurement results, but measurements to either confirm or find contradictory to what one have heard. It's not something one force that they heard is what is on the measurements. If one desires to put out accurate information for the readers, one must be careful to utilize most accurate data. Like anything in this world, you don't want to be responsible for spreading false info do you?
I've seen some crazy measurements put out by reviewers, and it is so obvious it's wrong, but the reviewer chose to believe the measurements.