paradoxper
Headphoneus Supremus
I'm saying even before all this tech natural selection was already skewed.
No, I did get that. I mean, I just didn't get your explanation of getting there.
I'm saying even before all this tech natural selection was already skewed.
Everything evolves - as I have said previously, it is all a matter of timescale and perspective. Evolution of a single species is often not successful - and just because you are the dominant species, that doesn't mean you are immune from evolving into an unstable state and then disappearing. Just ask the dinosaurs, or the Megalodon shark or any species that tried to cope with a changing climate. I will say again: Your timescales are WAY too short. Humans haven't been around nearly long enough to even be in the same league as some of the past dominant species on this planet. You aren't going to see human evolution - but that doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
No, I did get that. I mean, I just didn't get your explanation of getting there.
@billybob _jcv: Why oh why did you change your avatar to a picture of that satanic freak Aleister Crowley? That guy is pure evil. Satan in the flesh.
EDIT: One thing is for sure . . . I'm glad that SOB is dead. I get the creeps just looking at someone so tangibly evil. Please tell me that this is just some October/Halloween thing.
@billybob _jcv: Why oh why did you change your avatar to a picture of that satanic freak Aleister Crowley? That guy is pure evil. Satan in the flesh.
EDIT: One thing is for sure . . . I'm glad that SOB is dead. I get the creeps just looking at someone so tangibly evil. Please tell me that this is just some October/Halloween thing.
I suspect you are going to be seeing a lot of disturbing avatars for the next month. It is "Occult October" in the TMAC thread.
Oh okay, that explains it. Thanks for clearing that up.
@Magick Man: He was pure evil and he also wrote a little book that said if you raped children you would live longer. Yeah you're right, he was wonderful.
Citation?
If you're referring to The Book of Lies, it wasn't about physical sex, it was written about spiritual union. When he talked about "sex magik" he wasn't referring to intercourse.
Citation?
If you're referring to The Book of Lies, it wasn't about physical sex, it was written about spiritual union. When he talked about "sex magik" he wasn't referring to intercourse.
I've never read the book but people who have read it have stated that he believed this. Based on how I've heard that notorious book described I've decided that I am never going to read it (or any other of his books for that matter) because of how evil I've deemed it to be. Have you read the book?
Yes, I own all of Crowley's books and have read most of them at last once, and some of them several times. Like I said, he used a great deal of metaphor in his writings, and often he would purposely mislead people. That was an extremely common practice in Victorian occult literature. He wasn't a "nice guy", by any stretch, but he also wasn't a murderer, rapist, or cannibal either. He played off of public fear and hatred to build a reputation, and that reputation has made him immortal in many ways.
He was the Alice Cooper/Marilyn Manson of his time, it was showmanship to build PR. When he wasn't trying to be a Victorian "shock jock", he wrote several very good books on meditation and yoga that are still respected and quoted today.
Have you read the greatest show on earth? I'm reading that atm.![]()