Quote:
So be it. Live and let live.
That's correct.
And yes, I couldn't care less if somebody wants to spend $250 on an in-ear aftermarket cable.
The one who's asking the price is not the fool.
What I find rather annoying is that people keep on literally promoting this stuff and I stumble over them threads over and over again.
"The stock cable doesn't show the real potential of this pair of cans. You better get the $250 whatever silver cable and let it burn-in for at least 500hrs. Benefits: better bottom end, more detailed, pulled curtain and whatnot.
Wait until you hear the $500 cable after 1000hrs! You wanna change your system because the cable is so revealing that all your gear sounds rubbish!"
Stupid engineers they don't even get that right, don't you think!?
People really buy into this. And companies are not ashamed to tell you the wildest stories. Why would they as long as people buy it.
I probably can't take it anymore.
Just image how much better a recording would sound if they would just let the cables burn in before they start the sessions. Especially the new ones. Do they need to be burned in equally? Darn!
You can't be serious. How about a cable needs to be replaced during the recordings. OMG!
You're talking about existence and value which are rather two different things in my book.
But if something doesn't exist (e.g. sound difference between $5 XLR cable and $1000 Kimber XLR cable), hence doesn't improve anything (soundwise), if your goal is to improve the sound quality, it has no value!
People talk about believes but don't understand that audio equipment is not about believes, it's about science.
As long as it is connected to believes and feelings, which is because it reproduces music, which is one of the most moving art forms, hifi people tend to project these feelings onto their gear. It's harder to relate emotionally to mathematics, right!?