cjl
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Posts
- 833
- Likes
- 206
That's because there is no overwhelming advantage of a $1K cable at audio frequencies.
There's also no underwhelming advantage of a $1k cable at audio frequencies, for that matter.
That's because there is no overwhelming advantage of a $1K cable at audio frequencies.
There's also no underwhelming advantage of a $1k cable at audio frequencies, for that matter.
There's also no underwhelming advantage of a $1k cable at audio frequencies, for that matter.
Even doing that it would hardly justify a thousand dollar price tag though...
-That depends. It could be argued - probably should, in my opinion - that price, and hence, by implication, the luxury/exclusivity aspect is part of the package you pay for when shelling out kilobucks on cables.
To put it bluntly: I suspect that if cables retailing in the multi-kilobuck range ever found their way to the bargain bin at Circuit City or equivalent, their properties would change, magically, over night.
Then let me tell you good sir that by paying me a thousand dollars you can be the proud, the one and only exclusive owner of a beautifully hand-crafted copper RCA cable made by yours truly.
I accept PayPal and all major credit cards.
Then let me tell you good sir that by paying me a thousand dollars you can be the proud, the one and only exclusive owner of a beautifully hand-crafted copper RCA cable made by yours truly.
And did I mention I am French? All the class and craftsmanship renown of the French in your very own audio cable.
I accept PayPal and all major credit cards.
I have a French bicycle from my university days. It has cables. I wonder if they could be adapted for audio use?
Which is why we have double blind testing. Nobody has ever yet been able to have any kind of significant results in telling cables apart in a DBT. I'm gonna quote bigshot for once, if you can't hear it then it doesn't matter.
I have a software background, Wi-Fi is the future.