Do 320kbps mp3 files really sound better? Take the test!
Apr 26, 2012 at 5:29 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 17

matti620

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Posts
133
Likes
12
The test takes 20 seconds:
http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/03/mp3-sound-quality-test-128-320/
 
Did you find out right?
 
My answer:
I'm using HD650 and got it wrong.
 
 
 
Second test:
http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/03/can-you-hear-this-hearing-test/
What's the highest frequency you can hear?
I notice up to 21kHz in HD650 with X2 volume gain.
 
 
Apr 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM Post #2 of 17
 
Got it right, but would need a bigger sample to be sure. I could hear 19kHz clearly, 20kHz maybe if there wasn't any background noise coming from my room.
 
 
 
Apr 26, 2012 at 6:13 PM Post #3 of 17
I got it right. Listened to the first, then second, then first again. Grado SR80i, modded. The difference is not that great on this test, really.
 

 
 
Apr 26, 2012 at 6:50 PM Post #5 of 17
Got it right, not a HUGE difference, but the pops in the background and the drums distort a TAD.
I can also hear up to 20khz.
I can gear down to about 17 hertz or so....I can FEEL 4 but I cant really say I hear it.
 
Apr 26, 2012 at 9:06 PM Post #6 of 17
I got it right,,, Though it's not as evident on this song. Depending on the song, it's a lot more evident between bitrate.

Beyer T5p using an Asus Xonar U3 sound card.

I tried a signal generator on my tablet and was able to hear upto around 20khz. But using my laptop setup, my sound card has quite a bit of hiss and I can only hear upto 19khz.
 
Apr 26, 2012 at 9:45 PM Post #7 of 17
See spoiler for hint, then spoiler inside spoiler for answer. But be honest, guys.
 
 
Listen to the cymbal + drum whenever both hit at the same time. 128kbps will sound like the cymbal just "breathed" out and completely omitted the drum spat.
 
I could hear that very clearly with my setup. MBP -> Fiio E11 -> JDS Labs O2 -> DT880.
 
It's clip #1
 
 
 
 
 
Apr 27, 2012 at 11:03 PM Post #8 of 17
I can honestly say without voting that I can't tell the difference.  Not really the best example I don't think, but I guessed wrong anyway.
 
Apr 27, 2012 at 11:17 PM Post #9 of 17
This.
 
And you don't want to know which pair of cans I'm using for this...
 
Anyways - compression artifacts are a weird deal; some material can be highly compressed and not sound naughty, other material cannot. I'm skeptical of the FR hearing test, due to my equipment, but last I knew my hearing topped out around 14-15k (and that's after lots of exposure to lots of very nasty things). 
Quote:
I can honestly say without voting that I can't tell the difference.  Not really the best example I don't think, but I guessed wrong anyway.

 
 

 
Apr 27, 2012 at 11:23 PM Post #11 of 17
That was mentioned in the comments, that the tones were not properly generated or set-up. If you have something like Audacity or Sound Forge you can generate a sweep and go with it. Make sure you set the audio output and sample rate at 96k so that it can clear 20khz without a problem (if it's left at 44.1k it will fold at 22.05khz). And no, this isn't the same as having an audiologist do it. 
 
 
Quote:
Got the the song part right, but I feel like I'm hearing some kind of background distortion in the test tones so I'm not sure where my hearing actually cuts out.

 
 

 
Apr 28, 2012 at 1:23 AM Post #12 of 17
I got it right using my HD650's.
 
Its easy if you listen to the cymbals. The correct sample is much more detailed and realistic (crisp). The 128kbps one is a bit "fuzzy" in comparison. I wouldn't be able to tell 320kbps vs lossless however.
 
 
Apr 28, 2012 at 1:34 AM Post #13 of 17
Got it right with my Monitor 10s. Actually, I found this test to be quite easy. I didn't even have to listen to the whole clip. However, there is another online test, which name escapes me right now, that was pretty difficult.
 
Apr 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM Post #14 of 17
using SE530
 
the clip was quite obvious imo, but surprisingly i could hear every single one of those kHz things. which just blows me away, id have thought for sure my hearing is damaged.
 
Apr 28, 2012 at 5:52 AM Post #15 of 17
 
Quote:
using SE530
 
the clip was quite obvious imo, but surprisingly i could hear every single one of those kHz things. which just blows me away, id have thought for sure my hearing is damaged.

 

Looks like it's depending on the software I use. I doubt I actually heard anything past 18kHz, maybe it was only clipping or some noise from the hardware.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top